4867 search results for Standard Specifications
CADD - Home
with Roadway Design, Structures Design, and Standard Specifications. All CADD Development CADD
https://www.fdot.gov/cadd/default.shtmE4X79
for this project. PLEASE READ STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION FY 2024-25
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d4/lettings/2025/apr04/e4x79.pdf?sfvrsn=ca314bd0_19710203FHWA
Tallahassee, Florida 32312 Re: State Specifications Office Section: 971 Proposed Specification, on File Daniel Strickland, P.E. State Specifications Engineer DS/dh Attachment cc: Florida, have the option of formulating the material according to his own specifications. However, in the resin. Preformed thermoplastic for raised rumble strips shall meet Standard Plans Index 546-001, be selected and blended to provide a material which is white or yellow conforming to standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2025-26/review/fhwa/9710203fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=e60528fd_15600201-724IMPL
with the coating manufacturer’s published specifications. Coal tar epoxies must attain a total dry film, % of the specified minimum film thicknesses, as determined by AMPP Paint Application Standard No. 2
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2024-25/review/implemented/5600201-724impl.pdf?sfvrsn=dc5cccb1_19160201-122resp
to quart cans, standard point of pick up for samples heading to FDOT for verification etc, is necessary and provide the following: “Should a tack sample fail specifications, the Engineer may
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2022/january-2022/review/comments-responses/9160201-122resp.pdf?sfvrsn=2e60df80_21050404-MM6.3VII.comm
, the plant's approved QCP, and Section 6 (Source of Supply–Steel) of the FDOT Standard Specifications." Providing an example of this letter on the company's letterhead is already a requirement during
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/1050404-mm6.3vii.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=7bea6b0a_07060000.comm
practice and specifications as the cleanest way to implement all the necessary changes at one time, the reference to the "Design Standards" to "Standard Plans". Response: Per Specs office, these changes
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/7060000.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=d764445d_09320303.comm
). Note, many suppliers already tested to the CSA standard, so should be able to supply data without, , to be consistent with proposed ASTM D30 GFRP bar specifications, consider further detailing the Tg
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/january-2018/review/comments-responses/9320303.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=40eaf0a6_0SP0070104-3.comm
in the Standard Specifications ebook. Preliminary review of the July 2017 edition did not find
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/january-2018/review/comments-responses/sp0070104-3.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=8f22722_09710605.resp
of the specifications. The black contrast thermoplastic does not have glass spheres. The portion of Section 711-4.4 that requires a mixture of glass and sharp silica sand is only for standard thermoplastic lines
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/comments-responses/9710605.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=e4f375cd_00020100BDI.resp
SP0020201BDI PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW FDOT D5 Construction Comments: (5-18-15) 2-7 Guaranty to Accompany Proposals: On contracts over $150,000, a proposal.... It should read: On contracts over "$150,000", a proposal.... Response: Quotes are not used around dollar value amounts per the Department’s style of writing specifications, in the Standard Specs, as it relates to the payment type? If the reason is to further assist BDI
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/comments-responses/0020100bdi.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=d01b2cd8_02000100.comm
the existing specifications referenced above and the proposed specification revisions should, (3) AASHTO M319-02, “Standard Specification for Reclaimed Concrete Aggregate for Unbound Soil
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/comments-responses/2000100.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=8459f94c_00090103SLLS.comm
SP0090103SLLS MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW Bob Burleson for Pete Kelley FTBA 850-942-1404 bburleson@ftba.com Comment: (3-4-14, Internal) Suspension of prequalification seems pretty harsh. Is this a big problem or is there one or two instances where it has been a problem? I am always wary of punitive specifications like this. Response: (as per David, in the standard specs but was removed for streamlined contracting special provisions. We have been having
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/comments-responses/0090103slls.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=3d33a2ee_00090103SLPQ.comm
SP0090103SLPQ MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW Bob Burleson for Pete Kelley FTBA 850-942-1404 bburleson@ftba.com Comment: (3-4-14, Internal) Suspension of prequalification seems pretty harsh. Is this a big problem or is there one or two instances where it has been a problem? I am always wary of punitive specifications like this. Response: (as per David, in the standard specs but was removed for streamlined contracting special provisions. We have been having
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/comments-responses/0090103slpq.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=8937438c_05360500.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Date: December 12, 2013 Originator: Stefanie D. Maxwell Contact Information: Stefanie.Maxwell@dot.state.fl.us or ext. 4314 Specification Title: Guardrail Specification Section, Article, or Subarticle Number: Articles: 536-5 Why does the existing language need to be changed? To delete the sentence that conflicts with the revised Design Standard, Note #17. Summary, the State Specifications Office for assistance in completing this form. Daniel Scheer 850-414-4130
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/internal/5360500.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=f7c8d4ae_00070701DC.resp
the language for the Standard Specifications? I noticed that the top of the page said, “District
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/comments-responses/0070701dc.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=54a5bbab_05210000.resp2
5210000 CONCRETE BARRIERS, TRAFFIC RAILING BARRIERS AND PARAPETS COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW John Mauthner 414-4334 john.mauthner@dot.state.fl.us Comments: (Internal, 9-30-13) The intent of this revision is to remove the word reflector from the specifications. Response: This has been changed. Does this include price and payment for providing and installing Barrier, : This is standard spec language for this requirement. No changes made. 2) 521-3.4 Procurement of Precast
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/comments-responses/5210000.resp2.pdf?sfvrsn=95ef07cf_06030000.resp
generic. Response: Agree. Sentence was modified to match the standard language, but left “roadside, , and the general fact that the specifications are a component of a larger set of contract documents governing
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/comments-responses/6030000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=da847b35_05270000.FHWA
: State Specifications and Estimates Office Section 527 Proposed Specification: 5270000 Detectable, Specifications Engineer DS/cah Attachment cc: Florida Transportation Builders' Assoc. State Construction, tested in accordance with the indicated Standard appropriate to the material.following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance FM 3-C1028 Dry Coefficient of Friction – 0.8 min. Wet, Jobs PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE * Applies only to plastic materials. ** Applies only
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/january-2014/review/fhwa/5270000.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=6e74fbe3_05270000.FHWA(REVISED)
: State Specifications and Estimates Office Section 527 Proposed Specification: 5270000 Detectable, , Signature on file Daniel Scheer, P.E. State Specifications Engineer DS/cah Attachment cc, with the indicated Standard appropriate to the material.following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance, Sheet (MSDS) Non-Hazardous, per RCRA Subtitle C 5270000.D01 All Jobs PROPERTY STANDARD TEST, Standards, Index No. 304 Acceptance Criteria and manufacturer’s drawings, specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/january-2014/review/fhwa/5270000.fhwa(revised).pdf?sfvrsn=c4f9250c_0