4868 search results for Standard Specifications
SPI-521-423
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 521-423 Traffic Railing (32" Vertical Shape) FY 2024-25 1 Index 521-423 Traffic Railing (32" Vertical Shape) Design Criteria NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 4 Criteria; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations The 32" Vertical Shape Traffic Railing is intended for use on bridges and retaining walls with raised sidewalks and design speed
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-521-423.pdf?sfvrsn=63cf11f4_1SPI-521-423
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 521-423 Traffic Railing (32" Vertical Shape) FY 2025-26 1 Index 521-423 Traffic Railing (32" Vertical Shape) Design Criteria NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 4 Criteria; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations The 32" Vertical Shape Traffic Railing is intended for use on bridges and retaining walls with raised sidewalks and design speed
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-521-423.pdf?sfvrsn=86ec7b72_17000303-724commResp
7000303 HIGHWAY SIGNING COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW Dana Knox Wo rk Phone: E-Mail: dana.knox@dot.state.fl.us Comments: (9-6-23 Industry) Remove this sentence/note: "For overhead school zone sign (FTP 31-06) install the signal head in field in accordance with the Plans and Standard Plans, Index 700-120 for overhead school zone sign." Response: (Specifications Office) The originator requested the change after the proposal was posted to Industry Review for comments. Action
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2024-25/review/comments-responses/7000303-724commresp.pdf?sfvrsn=d45c8049_19620902.resp
9620902 STRUCTURAL STEEL AND MISCELLANEOUS METAL ITEMS (OTHER THAN ALUMINUM) COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW Pat McCann 954 254-8317 pmccann@targetengineering.com Comments: (11-19-15) How will contractors, etc. comprehend that "submit", "submitted" mean electronic is acceptable? Should Division 1 include a statement that explains where "submit" is used it's understood that electronic is acceptable/preferred? Response: Proposed Article 4-1 of the Standard Specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/comments-responses/9620902.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=d56a4845_04110400.resp
4110400 EPOXY INJECTION OF CRACKS IN CONCRETE STRUCTURES COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW D5 Construction 386-943-5347 Comments: (11-24-15) For the entire Electronic Submittal Revisions No. 1 Use the word “electronically submit” instead of just “submit” because it leaves it open for interpretation. Response: Proposed Article 4-1 of the Standard Specifications addresses all submissions to be electronic. No change will be made. ******************************************************************************
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/comments-responses/4110400.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=a1f82730_03460202-723 resp
3460202 STRUCTURAL PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW John McKechnie (850) 553-2236 john.mckechnie@dot.gov Comments: (8-25-22 Industry) Concur that revisions be made to the Materials manual to: Remove the Moderate Heat (MH) designation for consistency with AASHTO M85. Response: Confirmed with submitter that this comment is concurrence of the MH designation removal from the Standard Specifications. No further action needed. ******************************************************************************
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2023-24/review/comments-responses/3460202-723-resp.pdf?sfvrsn=32254add_13520800-723resp
3520800 All Jobs 3520800 GRINDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMMENTS FROM INTERNAL/INDUSTRY REVIEW John Bosnoian, P.E., C.W.I (904) 903-0934 jbosnoian@hntb.com Comments: (9-1-22 Industry) Would this additional pay quantity be eligible for design build lump sum projects as well? Response: The proposed changes are for the Standard Specifications. However, we do plan to also make changes to the Design Build Boiler Plate and Lump Sum Special Provisions so the proposed changes would also apply
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2023-24/review/comments-responses/3520800-723resp.pdf?sfvrsn=a7ec87b9_1PGM MGT Memo 22-01 (Standard Specs Annual Publication).docx
PGM MGT Memo 22-01 (Standard Specs Annual Publication).docx, Nguyen (FHWA) SUBJECT: FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction – Annual, publication to an annual publication of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The July 2022 Standard Specifications will be the last semiannual publication with an anticipated, , 2023. The first annual publication will be the July 2023 Standard Specifications with an anticipated
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/resources/bulletins/pgm-mgt-memo-22-01-(standard-specs-annual-publication)-docx.pdf?sfvrsn=ab11ba63_29290101ind
Origination Form Specifications Name: Andrew Pinkham Standard Specification Section: 929 Email: andrew.pinkham@dot.state.fl.us Special Provision: Date: 2025-06-05T11:31:16Z Associated Specs: None Summary: This change aligns supplementary cementitous materials requirements with AASHTO equivalents (as available) and updates strength activity index and LOI requirements for metakaolin. Justification: Alignment with AASHTO permits utilization of our AASHTO COMP resources. SMO is seeing
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/industry/9290101ind.pdf?sfvrsn=fce7de8a_19960103FHWA
standard for LAN and Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) access and physical layer specifications. 4.IEEE, specifications as published in the IEEE 802.1Q standard and has a minimum 4-kilobit VLAN address table, area network (MAN) access and physical layer specifications. 4.IEEE 802.3u supplement standard, Tallahassee, Florida 32312 Re: State Specifications Office Section: 996 Proposed Specification, Strickland, P.E. State Specifications Engineer DS/jb Attachment cc: Florida Transportation
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2025-26/review/fhwa/9960103fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=56ab2001_1SpecsHandbk
if the FDOT Standard Specifications, Special Provisions, and Supplemental Specifications address, or conflict with the specifications. Do not use a TSP to override an implemented Standard, of this Handbook. Coordinate with the District Specifications Office which standard specification, the Plans. 3-2 DEVELOPMENT AND FORMAT In some cases, the Standard Specifications must be modified, (BABA) requirements, per Section 6 of the Standard Specifications. If applicable, ensure that any
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/resources/guidance/specshandbk-6-18-25.pdf?sfvrsn=f3d82b0d_30050101.origind
Contract Documents: The Standard Specifications and the Design Standards can be accessed from, Specifications. 6. Supplemental Specifications. 7. Standard Specifications. Computed dimensions govern, ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/0050101.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=7de2786e_0700-041-IndustryReviewResponse
to the specifications regarding these nuts and the change to this Standard is to correspond with the changes, Industry Review Comments and Responses FDOT – Standard Plans 1 Index 700-041 Span Sign, . COMMENTS AND RESPONSES BLACK = Industry Review Comments BLUE = Standard Plans Response GREEN, 700-040 detail and the specifications do not agree. Specification 649-7 calls out the retainer nut, that Specification Section 5-2 places the Standard Plans as a higher governing order than the Standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/irr/2026/700-041-industryreviewresponse.pdf?sfvrsn=48f1b877_15360500.comm
: (12-17-13) There's actually a mistake in note 17 on Index 400. The reference to "Standard Specifications" is incorrect, "Standard" should not be there. The spec language that is being deleted, for project installation requirements? The Standard Specifications seems to be a more appropriate location, is to remove language from the Design Indexes and place the language in the specifications. Shouldn't we, for the revision as, “To delete the sentence that conflicts with the revised Design Standard, Note #17
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/comments-responses/5360500.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=63ecff16_09710605ind
Origination Form Specifications Name: Ryan Gray Standard Specification Section: 971 Email, and Industry Review) What is the schedule for implementation? The Standard Specifications eBook, of specifications? Neither List Specifications Affected: Other Affected Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans Myself Yes Florida Design Manual No Structures Manual No Basis, , and permanent raised rumble strips. Which FDOT offices does the change impact? Specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/industry/9710605ind.pdf?sfvrsn=54149857_1630-010-001
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction PURPOSE: To provide standard procedures, (Department) employee may request revisions to the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge, by the Department that add to or revise the Standard Specifications or Supplemental Specifications, setting forth conditions varying from or in addition to the Standard Specifications or Supplemental Specifications applicable to a specific project or a specific set of conditions. Standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/guidance/630-010-001.pdf?sfvrsn=d5016772_17040300int
Origination Form Specifications Name: Ryan Gray Standard Specification Section: 704 Email, criteria cannot be met - The Specifications currently allow for 36" markers only, requiring an MSP, . Do the changes affect other types of specifications? Neither List Specifications Affected: Other Affected Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans No Florida Design Manual, ? Specifications and Systems Management What is the impact to districts with this change? None Does
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/internal/7040300int.pdf?sfvrsn=a8267bbf_13300601int
Origination Form Specifications Name: Mary Jane Hayden Standard Specification Section: 330, and Industry Review) What is the schedule for implementation? The Standard Specifications eBook, ). Do the changes affect other types of specifications? Neither List Specifications Affected: Other Affected Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans No Florida Design Manual, , and fostering talent; explain how? Yes, this is removing an outdated element from the Specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/internal/3300601int.pdf?sfvrsn=a15936d2_13300601ind
Origination Form Specifications Name: Mary Jane Hayden Standard Specification Section: 330, and Industry Review) What is the schedule for implementation? The Standard Specifications eBook, ). Do the changes affect other types of specifications? Neither List Specifications Affected: Other Affected Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans No Florida Design Manual, , and fostering talent; explain how? Yes, this is removing an outdated element from the Specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/industry/3300601ind.pdf?sfvrsn=2f7a16d6_17040300ind
Origination Form Specifications Name: Ryan Gray Standard Specification Section: 704 Email, criteria cannot be met - The Specifications currently allow for 36" markers only, requiring an MSP, . Do the changes affect other types of specifications? Neither List Specifications Affected: Other Affected Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans No Florida Design Manual, ? Specifications and Systems Management What is the impact to districts with this change? None Does
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/industry/7040300ind.pdf?sfvrsn=a215def7_1