1780 search results for bridge inspection
Dev173SSPI
documenting this inspection and the recorded elevations to the Engineer for approval. Include photographs, of 1/16 inch or less. Additionally, monitor all directly adjoining structures, such as adjacent bridge, the pavement or structure to the desired grade. 173-5.9 Sleeper Slabs: For bridge approach slabs, the integrity of the pipe and storm drain system through inspection, either visual or by remote
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/otherfdotlinks/developmental/files/dev17366b03645a6b04c949a029f6dd32299e0.pdf?sfvrsn=89d8ec18_6E4W84
/A Total Roadway Length: 8.172 Miles Contract Days: 452 Total Bridge Length: 0.000 Miles Letting, barrier, inlets), monitor existing structures (inspection, settlement, vibration), earthwork, SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION FY2024-25 (SECTION 7-13) FOR INSURANCE LIMITS. Call Order: 001, - LITTER REMOVAL AC 65.040 0107- 2- MOWING AC 24.560 0108- 1- MONITOR EXISTING STRUCTURES- INSPECTION
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d4/lettings/2024/sep06/e4w84.pdf?sfvrsn=91218803_19600100-722origind
reinforcement for compliance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and AASHTO LRFD Bridge, component configurations, connections, anchorages, inlets, outlets, drains, high point inspection port details, anchorage inspection details, permanent anchorage caps, application limits of the PT
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2022/july-2022/review/internal/9600100-722origind.pdf?sfvrsn=6c22b479_25610401.FHWA
of Record qualified in Type Work Category 4.3, Complex Bridge Design. Provide Submit a contingency plan, ft-cd for inspection. All drawings and calculations must be submitted and accepted before any work, by the Contractor’s Engineer of Record qualified in Type Work Category 4.3, Complex Bridge Design. Submit, -cd for work, and 50 ft-cd for inspection. All drawings and calculations must be submitted
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/fhwa/5610401.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=fe5634e1_00050700.FHWA
reference marks or points necessary to provide lines and grades for construction of all roadway, bridge, , and furnish copies to the Engineer at the time of completion of the project. The Engineer’s inspection, reference marks or points necessary to provide lines and grades for construction of all roadway, bridge, , and furnish copies to the Engineer at the time of completion of the project. The Engineer’s inspection
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/fhwa/0050700.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=a10f8a6d_00050700-REVISED.FHWA
and grades for construction of all roadway, bridge, and miscellaneous items. When performing, of completion of the project. The Engineer’s inspection, checking, or acceptance of the Contractor’s field, or points necessary to provide lines and grades for construction of all roadway, bridge, to the Engineer at the time of completion of the project. The Engineer’s inspection, checking
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/fhwa/0050700-revised.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=f5bac6cf_0fdot-bdv31-977-143-rpt
A. Faraone Bridge Software Institute Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure, Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Bridge Software Institute University, 16. Abstract When performing geotechnical design of bridge foundations, two sources of uncertainty, and construction costs can be significant relative to those allocated for other bridge components, phenomena can lead to increased uniformity in levels of conservatism associated with bridge foundation
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bdv31-977-143-rpt.pdf?sfvrsn=ec0fd251_59600202.FHWA
. Test anchorages in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, inspection details, anchorage inspection details, permanent anchorage caps, and application limits, ) is deleted and the following substituted: 5. Test anchorages in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge, , inlets, outlets, drains, high point outlet inspection details, anchorage inspection details
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/fhwa/9600202.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=57771030_0MD00900LS
to the Contract Lump Sum Price. 9-11.2 Notification of Quality Assurance Inspection Arrangements for Fabrication of Critical Items: In order to facilitate quality assurance inspection, Commercial Inspection as stated in 460-23. The fabrication schedule must be submitted to the Department’s Commercial Inspection State Materials Office, with a copy provided to the Engineer, before, to: steel bridge components, overhead cantilevered sign supports with cantilevered arms exceeding 45 feet
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2004/january-2004/workbook/md00900ls.pdf?sfvrsn=d7e8e139_0E8U96BSN
After consideration in accordance with Article 3-1 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge, of the Department’s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Insurance companies must, /bidder-assist.shtm, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and the Special Provisions, No: N/A Total Roadway Length: 0.000 Miles Contract Days: 1825 Total Bridge Length: 0.000 Miles, the full advertisement Description: This performance-based contract requires the inspection, management
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/tp/assetmaintenanceprojects/e8u96/e8u96bsn.pdf?sfvrsn=edd727c9_1PublicHearing_MARION COUNTY_Summary_2025-2029
- I-75 WILDWOOD WEIGH STATION - INSPECTION BARN UPGRADES Type of Work: MCCO WEIGH STATION STATIC/WIM, 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Bridge/Roadway/Contract Maintenance State $454,457 $468,088 $487,617, : ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Phase Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Bridge/Roadway/Contract, : ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Phase Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Bridge/Roadway/Contract Maintenance, of Work: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Phase Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Bridge/Roadway/Contract
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/fdot-d5-work-program-reports/fdot-work-program-public-hearing-reports-past-years/publichearing_marion-county_summary_2025-2029.pdf?sfvrsn=9fb3c816_1E6P36BSN
in accordance with Article 3-1 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Insurance companies must be authorized, - ordering/bidder-assist.shtm, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Bridge Length: 0.000 Miles Letting Date: 01/13/25 Total Proposal Length: 0.000 Miles Contract, for an Asset Maintenance contract that consists of inspection, management, and performance
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d6/asset-main/e6p36/e6p36bsn.pdf?sfvrsn=2cb57c42_1E21U0-R0
Contract Days: 365 Total Bridge Length: 0.000 Miles Letting Date: 04/16/25 Total Proposal Length: 0.000, of contract letting. The Vehicular Impact Attenuators inspection and cleaning will occur every April, (REPLACE) (TYPE ET 2000) EA 3.000 E536- 6- 46 END ANCHORAGE ASSEM (REPLACE) (BRIDGE) EA 4.000 E536, (REPL GUARDRAIL BEAM) EA 1.000 E536-306-501 END ANCHOR ASSEM BRIDGE (REPL SPECIAL END SHOE) EA 3.000 E536-306-509 END ANCHOR ASSEM BRIDGE (REPL ANCHOR PANEL SECT) EA 3.000 E536-308-501 END ANCHOR
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d2/lettings/2025/apr16/e21u0-r0.pdf?sfvrsn=81ac219c_1Historical Item Averages Market Area 06
- INSPECTION AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING 0108 2 2 $21,380.47 $64,141.40 3.000 EA N MONITOR EXISTING, , SUPERSTRUCTURE 0400 4 5 2 $2,076.69 $271,215.86 130.600 CY N CONCRETE CLASS IV, BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE, WITH SHRINKAGE REDUCING ADMIXTURE 0400 7 1 1 $13.00 $10,634.00 818.000 SY N BRIDGE DECK GROOVING 0400 9 1 1 $13.50 $11,043.00 818.000 SY N BRIDGE DECK PLANING 0400148 1 $850.00 $12,750.00 15.000 CF N PLAIN, 2,747.000 LB N REINFORCING STEEL- BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE 0415 1 9 1 $1.50 $28,401.00 18,934.000 LB N
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/estimates/reports/historical-item-average-costs-reports/moving/market-area/pdf/historical-item-averages-market-area-06.pdf?sfvrsn=75a0a783_15Historical Item Averages Market Area 09
MONITOR EXISTING STRUCTURES- INSPECTION AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING 0108 2 1 $28,500.00 $28,500.00 1.000, $193,800.00 120.000 CY N CONCRETE CLASS IV, BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE 0400 4 11 1 $819.00 $78,050.70 95.300 CY N CONC CLASS IV, RETAINING WALLS 0400 7 1 1 $30.00 $10,740.00 358.000 SY N BRIDGE DECK, - BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE 0415 1 5 1 $1.50 $21,429.00 14,286.000 LB N REINFORCING STEEL- BRIDGE
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/estimates/reports/historical-item-average-costs-reports/moving/market-area/pdf/historical-item-averages-market-area-09.pdf?sfvrsn=102ae479_204520402.origind
Jobs PRECAST SEGMENTAL BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. (REV 4-285-18-15) SUBARTICLE 452-4.2 is deleted, curves on a continuous layout of an entire unit of the bridge between expansion joints. Maintain, completion of erection of the unit in the bridge between expansion joints, for inspection and consolidation of the bottom corners when the next load is placed in the webs, ’s Segmental Bridge Design CriteriaStructures Manual edition noted in the Plans. Obtain
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/internal/4520402.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=47aca6e5_01-5. G. Mullins - Estimating the As-Placed Grout Volume of ACPs
volume monitoring systems and increased details in field inspection logs, the as-built volume of grout, Head Vo l u me, grout head required by FDOT 2020 Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge, or 20% of total pile length (5ft or 10% for non-bridge foundations). • Vo l ume 3: Incremental Vo l
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/geotechnical/conference/grip/2024/1-5-g-mullins---estimating-the-as-placed-grout-volume-of-acps.pdf?sfvrsn=18adcaa0_1Section11.6-062518_1-19WB
(SSPC-PA) Guide 13/AASHTO National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA) Steel Bridge Collaboration S.8.1, inspection/testing of shop applied coatings. 11.6.5 GENERAL INFORMATION These preapproved procedures
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2019/january-2019/materials-manual/section11-6-062518_1-19wb.pdf?sfvrsn=34a51280_1Section11.6-062518_1-19WB
(SSPC-PA) Guide 13/AASHTO National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA) Steel Bridge Collaboration S.8.1, inspection/testing of shop applied coatings. 11.6.5 GENERAL INFORMATION These preapproved procedures
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2019/july-2019/materials-manual/section11-6-062518_1-19wb.pdf?sfvrsn=63768d21_1E51F4
Florida Department of Transportation Bid Solicitation Notice and Approximate Quantities Letting:05240206Call Order:004Proposal:E51F4District:05 Counties:LAKE Road Name:SR 33 / SR 50 Limits:11020002 Project(s):44709315201(*) Federal Aid No: N/A Total Roadway Length:0.640MilesContract Days:180 Total Bridge Length:0.000MilesLetting Date:02/06/24 Total Proposal Length:0.640MilesContract, 0108- 1-MONITOR EXISTING STRUCTURES- INSPECTION AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING (44709315201) LS1.000
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d5/lettings/2024/feb06/e51f4.pdf?sfvrsn=e7afa4c6_1