Search

Exhibit 212-8

' 20' 6 0 ' C R 4 ' 4 0 ' SWEPT PATH LEGEND: L� FDM 212 * WB-40 AASHTO 2018 SU

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/exhibit-212-8.pdf?sfvrsn=62f1adc6_1

Exhibit 212-10

' 4 ' R 5 5 ' R 5 5 ' R 4 ' R L� FDM 212 * RETURNS: Returns Depicted: Three

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/exhibit-212-10.pdf?sfvrsn=adc6a467_1

for the development of TTCP sheets. See FDM 240 for requirements of TTCP designs. The amount, as discussed in FDM 921.5. 921.7 Detour Plan Sheets Detours often use an outline (stick diagram, responsive mode signal operations for the duration of the contract. Refer to FDM 941 for required plan, regardless of sheet size selected. Refer to FDM 943 for required plan content

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm921ttcp.pdf?sfvrsn=63147581_1

2025FDM275TreeRelocation

Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual 275 - Tree and Palm Relocation 275 Tree and Palm Relocation 275.1 General This chapter provides the criteria and requirements for relocation of trees and palms. For Tree and Palm Relocation plan content, refer to FDM 944. Relocation of trees and palms requires the approval of the District Landscape Architect. Develop a root pruning and relocation plan tailored to the species being relocated. Time periods r equired between root pruning and r

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm275treerelocation.pdf?sfvrsn=a87a8ca5_1

2025FDM152ShopDrawings

-Conventional Projects: Delete FDM 152.3 and see RFP for Shop Drawing requirements. 152.4 Submittals, for guidance. Figures 152.11.1 through 152.11.3 shown in FDM 152.11 illustrate the flow of submittals, was reviewed in accordance with FDM 152 and with the Contract. Modification for Non-Conventional Projects: Delete FDM 152.5.1 and replace with the following: 152.5.1 Review Requirements for EOR Topic, in accordance with FDM 152 and with the Contract. 152.5.2 Requirements for Consultant EOR (Full Services

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm152shopdrawings.pdf?sfvrsn=41ccee65_2

2025FDM132PSESubmittalPackageRev

professional signs and seals each revised document in accordance with the requirements of FDM 130, sheet. See FDM 910 for instructions on recording a revision on the Key Sheet. Submit each revised, with the revision package in the revision memo (FDM 132.5). The revision memo then indicates which component, to the appropriate office (see FDM 131.2.1 ). The receiving office will check the revisions

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm132psesubmittalpackagerev.pdf?sfvrsn=b4303cb0_3

2025FDM213ModRoundabout

. The criteria contained in the FDM are supplemented by guidance provided in the National Cooperative, are required for high-speed approaches as discussed in FDM 213.3.1 . For low-speed approaches, 50-foot, roadway (400 feet) does not apply within the functional area of the intersection. See FDM 212.4, . See FDM 213.3.7 for cross slope requirements. 213.3.5 Splitter Islands Splitter islands, fastest path analysis has been adopted by the Department and can be downloaded from the FDM web page

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm213modroundabout.pdf?sfvrsn=42297d2c_3

Exhibit 211-5

design speed. Taper length based on L=WS. 70:1 taper as shown 6 Per FDM 210.8.1, Maximuim

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/exhibit-211-5.pdf?sfvrsn=6e084a54_2

Exhibit 211-3

horizontal curves, 0° 45' or 76.39:1 (use 80:1) Per FDM 210.8.1 maximum deflections without managed

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/exhibit-211-3.pdf?sfvrsn=b5324a3c_3

Roadway Criteria

- Roadway Design Criteria Administrator FDOT Design Manual Current Design Manual FDM (2018

https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/cs/cs.shtm

ADA Standard Plans

. Criteria moved to FDM Chapter 214. Construction details moved to Indexes 522-003 or 330-001. 102-660

https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/ada/adastandardplans.shtm

Exhibit 211-3

horizontal curves, 0° 45' or 76.39:1 (use 80:1) Per FDM 210.8.1 maximum deflections without managed

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/exhibit-211-3.pdf?sfvrsn=3a66de42_2

Exhibit 211-5

design speed. Taper length based on L=WS. 70:1 taper as shown 6 Per FDM 210.8.1, Maximuim

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/exhibit-211-5.pdf?sfvrsn=3b37accf_2

Exhibit 212-8

' 20' 6 0 ' C R 4 ' 4 0 ' SWEPT PATH LEGEND: L� FDM 212 * WB-40 are by AutoTURN 4.0

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/exhibit-212-8.pdf?sfvrsn=9b1bab0d_2

Exhibit 212-10

' 4 ' R 5 5 ' R 5 5 ' R 4 ' R L� FDM 212 * * Add 70' For Each Additional WB-40

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/exhibit-212-10.pdf?sfvrsn=8b3c1d78_3

SPI-425-080

Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 425-080 Utility Conflicts Thru Drainage Structures FY 2025-26 1 Index 425-080 Utility Conflicts Thru Drainage Structures Design Criteria FDOT Design Manual (FDM) ; Drainage Manual (DM) ; Drainage Design Guide (DDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations These details are for construction field expediency to resolve utility conflicts that cannot be remedied by relocation. Review the wall section for strength when the conflict

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-425-080.pdf?sfvrsn=186d9198_1

SPI-436-001

Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 436-001 Trench Drain FY 2025-26 1 Index 436-001 Trench Drain Design Criteria FDOT Design Manual (FDM) ; Drainage Manual (DM) Design Assumptions and Limitations Trench drain is intended for use in gutters and driveways as shown on the typical locations on Sheet 2. Type I is intended for use in Type E, F, and drop curbing, and adjacent to traffic separators and standard barrier walls. The width of the channel grate for Type I

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-436-001.pdf?sfvrsn=52437c0_1

SPI-521-002

Specifications , 8th Edition; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) ; FDOT Design Manual (FDM) ; AASHTO, (PPB) when bridge piers require protection. See FDM 215 and SDG , Chapter 2, for PPB, applicability, see the Pier Protection Selection Flowchart in FDM 215 . Generally, if the bridge pier, 44" or 56") depending on its proposed location relative to the bridge pier, as defined in FDM 215

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-521-002.pdf?sfvrsn=fd9632c1_1