3159 search results for intersection

Documents & Publications

and Protection Innovative Operational Safety Improvements at Unsignalized Intersections (2008) Library of Approved Safety Messages for DMS Manual on Intersection Control Evaluation Manual on Uniform Traffic, of Yellow Change and Red Clearance Intervals for Signalized Intersections Evaluation of Dual Cable Signal

https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/doc-library/doc-library.shtm

6700000.impl

. Furnish and install a traffic controller assembly or flashing intersection control beacon controller, controller assembly or intersection control beacon controller assembly listed on the Department’s Approved Product List (APL). Traffic controller assemblies and intersection control beacon controller, the requirements of Section 676. 670-2.4 Flashing Intersection Control Beacon Controller Assembly: A flashing intersection control beacon controller assembly must consist of a Type 3 flasher wired

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/implemented/6700000.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=388e8a00_0

Chapter09 BicycleFacilities 2024

intersections, sidepath intersection sight distance requirements must consider both what is needed, Intersections 9-39 C.6.a Grade Separated Crossings 9-40 C.6.b Sidepath Crossings 9-41 C.6.c Midblock Shared Use Path Crossings 9-42 C.6.c.1 Intersections with Yield Control 9-42 C.6.c.2 Intersections, Intersection Sight Distance Calculated Lengths of Roadway and Path Lengths 9-44, Turn Drop Lane (Curb and Gutter) 9-12 Figure 9 – 10 "Tee" Intersection with Bicycle Lane, Separate

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/floridagreenbook/review-files/chapter09-bicyclefacilities-2024.docx?sfvrsn=e6817c55_1

2026 TEM---Chapter 5 - Special Operational Topics

at the proposed location, including intersecting sight distances, proximity to intersection and driveway conflict areas, number and configuration of approach lanes to signalized intersections, SYSTEM 5.1-5 Figure 5.1-2. Midblock Crosswalk 5.1.5.2 Side Street Stop-Controlled Intersections Golf cart crossings at roadway intersections with side street stop control along any state road must, to the mainline tangent is 90 degrees (±15 degrees). o Offset intersections are not considered for golf cart

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/trafficservices/studies/tem/tem-2026/2026-tem---chapter-5---special-operational-topics.pdf?sfvrsn=29132323_2

102-604

X 200' 200' 50' More Than 200' Less Than 200' 2 1 102-604 TWO-LANE, TWO-WAY, INTERSECTION, in accordance with Index 102-603. Placement 6. For unsignalized intersections, use Temporary Raised, ” and channelizing device 2. X = Work Zone Sign Spacing work within or near the intersection. 1. This Index, THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION LANE CLOSURE FOR WORK MORE THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION W20-7 W20-1F, , INTERSECTION WORK 11/01/22 SYMBOLS: Work Area Work Zone Sign Flagger Channelizing Device (See

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/idx/102-604.pdf?sfvrsn=d2b282ed_1

102-604

' X X 200' 200' 50' More Than 200' Less Than 200' 2 1 102-604 TWO-LANE, TWO-WAY, INTERSECTION, in accordance with Index 102-603. Placement 6. For unsignalized intersections, use Temporary Raised, ” and channelizing device 2. X = Work Zone Sign Spacing work within or near the intersection. 1. This Index, LESS THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION LANE CLOSURE FOR WORK MORE THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION W20-7, , INTERSECTION WORK 11/01/22 SYMBOLS: Work Area Work Zone Sign Flagger Channelizing Device

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/idx/102-604.pdf?sfvrsn=d478856_1

102-604

' X X 200' 200' 50' More Than 200' Less Than 200' 2 1 102-604 TWO-LANE, TWO-WAY, INTERSECTION, in accordance with Index 102-603. Placement 6. For unsignalized intersections, use Temporary Raised, ” and channelizing device 2. X = Work Zone Sign Spacing work within or near the intersection. 1. This Index, LESS THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION LANE CLOSURE FOR WORK MORE THAN 200' FROM INTERSECTION W20-7, , INTERSECTION WORK 11/01/22 SYMBOLS: Work Area Work Zone Sign Flagger Channelizing Device

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2027/idx/102-604.pdf?sfvrsn=ccdad963_1

E55F5

pedestrian detection warning systems at seven intersections on State Road 436 between Northlake, SIGNALIZATION AND MAINTENANCE, INTERSECTION ED 700.000 0999- 25- INITIAL CONTINGENCY AMOUNT, DO NOT BID LS, DOCUMENTATION- INTERSECTION EA 7.000 0633- 1-121 FIBER OPTIC CABLE, F&I, UNDERGROUND,2-12 FIBERS

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d5/lettings/2025/apr01/e55f5.pdf?sfvrsn=a145459c_1

DanforthGEOPAKDetailModeling3DCC

 Innovative Solutions for tomorrow’s transportation needs Detail Modeling Tools 3 D Civil Cells FDOTSS4 Vern Danforth Wednesday, June 10, 2014 1:25pm Innovative Solutions for tomorrow’s transportation needs Detailing the Corridor Design • Intersections • Median crown crossover, • Quick Profile Transition • Profile Intersection Point • Quick Profile from Surface • Profile, • Profile from Surface • Profile Intersection Point • Project Profile to Element • Profile by Slope

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/cadd/downloads/archived-documentations/danforthgeopakdetailmodeling3dcc.pdf?sfvrsn=57c6d46_2

Chapter 5 - Special Operational Topics

intersection ▪ The proposed location is outside the influence area of adjacent signalized intersections, at the proposed location, including intersecting sight distances, proximity to intersection and driveway conflict areas, number and configuration of approach lanes to signalized intersections, and roadway speed, Street Stop-Controlled Intersections Golf cart crossings at roadway intersections with side street, . • Side street alignment angle to the mainline tangent is 90 degrees (±15 degrees). Offset intersections

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/trafficservices/studies/tem/tem-2025/chapter-5---special-operational-topics.pdf?sfvrsn=8257af41_1

6710000.resp

at signalized intersections differs from the roadway criteria. Could the wording be revised, of Pedestrian Detectors at signalized intersections (controlled by existing NEMA or 170 cabinet assemblies, pedestrian activations.” Change made. 2. Our intersection lighting in District 1 is most often tied, at new intersections to be powered with the traffic signal? This may cause issues with maintaining agencies. Response: It is not the intent to force lighting at new intersections to be powered

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/january-2018/review/comments-responses/6710000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=13e1c547_0

ICE in PDE Training_July 2025

Module 3 6 July 2025 Module 1 ICE Overview 7 MODULE 1 AGENDA Why & When Intersection Forms, system prior to design when any of the following applies: • New intersection signalization • Major reconstruction, such as: • Adding a left-turn lane • Adding an intersection • Converting to a roundabout WHEN IS ICE APPLIED? 14 ICE required: • New intersection signalization • Major, ICE required: • New intersection signalization • Major reconstruction • Convert to a full median

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/environment/module-2_3_v4_with-poll-questions.pdf?sfvrsn=aae14af6_3

Safety Analysis Methods

include: Safe Strides 2 Zero (SS2Z) – conducting an annualscreening of signalized intersections on the SHS. Identifies high crash signalized intersections and isshown in the Safety Assessment Dashboard, , intersection control, number of approach legs). FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) The ICE process quantitatively evaluates several intersection control scenarios (alternatives) and ranks, -based” procedure such as ICE creates a transparent and consistent approach to consider intersection

https://www.fdot.gov/Safety/safetyengineering/safetyanalysismethods.shtm

Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) 2026

adjacent signalized intersections (d) Highway and intersection geometry (turn lanes) (e) Location, of a standard signalized intersection to alternative intersections such as a roundabout, median U-turn, comparison of the viable alternative intersections. (6) If the intersection is currently signalized, .................................................................... 3-17 3.13 Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing, ............................................................................................ 3-18 Chapter 4 Intersection Turning Movement Counts

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/trafficservices/studies/muts/muts-2025/manual-on-uniform-traffic-studies-(muts)-2026.pdf?sfvrsn=2d2fb9ee_1

Jupiter US 1 Bridge Replacement Project

overlooks. For the 21-month bridge closure and detour, temporary intersection improvements consisted, 706/Indiantown Road and U.S. 1 and Alternate A1A/Beach Road. Permanent intersection improvements, and surrounding intersections (4.1 miles) Contractor Johnson Bros. Corp. Project Manager Joel Jara, Management & Intersection Improvements Documents & Publications Construction Updates Public

https://www.fdot.gov/projects/jupiterus1bridge/main

2025FDM231Lighting

intersection segment and for each roadway segment between signalized intersections. Roadway lighting, Intersection Lighting Retrofit For existing signalized intersections where a full signal upgrade, , intersection, interchange, sidewalk, etc.). 231.1.2 Structural Supports AASHTO’s LRFD, Intersection and Roundabout Lighting New or Reconstruction 3.0 Std. 1.5 Min. 1.5 Std. 1.2 Min. 4:1 or Less 10:1 or Less N/A Intersection Lighting Retrofit 1.5 Std. 1.0 Min. 1.5 Std. 1.0

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/review/2025fdm231lighting.pdf?sfvrsn=b6f04a62_7

2025FDM231Lighting

intersection segment and for each roadway segment between signalized intersections. Roadway, , intersection, interchange, sidewalk, etc.). 231.1.2 Structural Supports AASHTO’s LRFD, /A Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Lighting New or Reconstruction 3.0 Std. 1.5 Min. 1.5 Std. 1.2 Min. 4:1 or Less 10:1 or Less N/A Intersection Lighting Retrofit 1.5 Std. 1.0 Min. 1.5 Std. 1.0 Min. Isolated Lighting 1.0-1.5 1.0-1.5 Unsignalized Intersection Lighting All Project Types

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/2025fdm231lighting.pdf?sfvrsn=1b5d719_1

711-002

A L K C u r b a n d G u t t e r APPROACH TO INTERSECTIONS DETAILS 150' Lane, FAR SIDE OF INTERSECTION DETAIL 6' 6' 6' BIKE LANE STRIPING STANDARD BUFFERED

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/idx/711-002.pdf?sfvrsn=2a7ec04_1

Ch9DetailModelingPwrPt

 FDOTSS3 Design and 3D Modeling FDOTSS3 Design and 3D Modeling O SS3 es g a d 3 ode g Chapter 9 Detail Modeling O SS3 es g a d 3 ode g Chapter 9 Detail Modeling Vern E. Danforth, P.E., FDOT Engineering/CADD System Office Engineering/CADD System Office February 25, 2015 Detailing the Corridor Design • Intersections Traffic separator nose • MES slope transitions Median crown,  Quick Profile Transition  Profile Intersection Point  Quick Profile from Surface  Profile

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/cadd/downloads/webinars/files/microstation/ch9detailmodelingpwrpt_a01ea57d-6dc1-444a-8baa-9cda1ecdd533.pdf?sfvrsn=756cb90_0

711-002

A L K C u r b a n d G u t t e r APPROACH TO INTERSECTIONS DETAILS 150' Lane, FAR SIDE OF INTERSECTION DETAIL 6' 6' 6' BIKE LANE STRIPING STANDARD BUFFERED

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/idx/711-002.pdf?sfvrsn=3b3cfe76_1
20 of 3159 results