8976 search results for test
9160401.impl
CRS-1h Test Conditions M i n i mum/Maximum Tests on Emulsion: Saybolt Furol Visc 77°F 20–100seconds, . EMULSIFIED ASPHALT GRADE NTSS-1hm Test Conditions M i n i mum/Maximum Tests on Emulsion: Saybolt Furol, maximum 0.30% (a) Tests on Residue From Distillation Test: Penetration (0.1mm) 77°F,100g,5seconds, (a) minimum 60% Sieve Test maximum 0.10% Residue by Distillation 500°F.Distillation minimum 55% Naphtha Portion 500°F.Distillation.(b) maximum 3% by volume Particle charge positive Tests on Residue From
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul07/files/9160401.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=f86f1488_0SS1600302
testing. If the Resolution Test results meet the requirements of Section 914 then the Engineer, to be stabilized. 160-3.2.1 Sampling and Testing of Local Material: Randomly select locations for sampling using a random number generator approved by the Engineer and test at the minimum frequency listed in the table below before mixing. The Engineer will reject the material for failing QC test results. The Engineer will sample for Verification and Resolution testing at the minimum frequency
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2011/files/ss1600302.pdf?sfvrsn=82752cc8_0SS1600302
testing. If the Resolution Test results meet the requirements of Section 914 then the Engineer, to be stabilized. 160-3.2.1 Sampling and Testing of Local Material: Randomly select locations for sampling using a random number generator approved by the Engineer and test at the minimum frequency listed in the table below before mixing. The Engineer will reject the material for failing QC test results. The Engineer will sample for Verification and Resolution testing at the minimum frequency
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2011/january-2011/workbook/ss1600302.pdf?sfvrsn=f039717e_09160000.origind
asphalt product requires testing by FM 1-T 283 and the test results indicate it is not required, testing and location where the test will be done shall be identified in the suppliers Quality Control, for the hot mix asphalt product requires testing by FM 1-T 283 and the test results indicate it, from the date of issue. The Department may sample and test pre-tested cut-back asphalt from, % Test Conditions Asphalt Emulsion Grade AE-90 Minimum/Maximum Tests on Emulsion: Saybolt Furol
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan13/files/9160000-origind.pdf?sfvrsn=288ed451_49930000-722comm
are still using previous NTPEP tests and would not meet Metropolitan Delineator Category, there is only 1 manufacturer that has tested on Datamine and does not meet the minimum for this category. Would you continue to accept previous NTPEP Tests run on Surface Mount Delineators or accept Durable, - To my knowledge all manufacturers are still using previous NTPEP tests which required 5 summer and 5 winter impacts. Datamine only shows 1 manufacture that has tested under the newer category since it
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2022/july-2022/review/comments-responses/9930000-722comm.pdf?sfvrsn=f29f4b7f_29930000-722resp
Weather Test. Will you be giving some grace period or do you plan to accept the 10 impact tests that were, all manufacturers are still using previous NTPEP tests and would not meet Metropolitan Delineator Category, there is only 1 manufacturer that has tested on Datamine and does not meet the minimum for this category. Would you continue to accept previous NTPEP Tests run on Surface Mount Delineators, Ground Mounted - To my knowledge all manufacturers are still using previous NTPEP tests which
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2022/july-2022/review/comments-responses/9930000-722resp.pdf?sfvrsn=b3176ae6_29750000.resp
and on the test deck by July 2009 unless the SMO has conducted the laboratory and field testing, the time to review this document. All but 2 of the lab tests are standard to the AASHTO R-31 test regimen. Mfgr’s already have coating systems tested to this standard. The 2 additional tests that are required are industry standard tests and can be completed (from spraying panels to test results, Comment: 975-1.3. Should lab test results, test panels for outdoor testing, and wet samples
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul09/files/9750000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=a1a62583_0SS9300000
, including tests of freshly mixed t testing. Visually examine all pecimens representing a given test at a given age after testing, and should any specimen be ound to be manifestly faulty the test, for more than six months after testing w r before use, except for the scaling resistance test, the packaged, dr liquid. Prepare and test three test specimens for each age of all of the hardened tests, by such examination withou s f senting a given test at a given age be found manifestly faulty either b testing
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2009/files/ss9300000.pdf?sfvrsn=a2288ee8_02023 CMVRB Annual Report final
the citation was issued. It is the Board’s responsibility to consider testimony or other evidence, questions to any witness at any time during the proceedings, and only testimony and evidence pertinent to the Board’s action is allowed. Irrelevant and immaterial or unduly repetitious testimony
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/cvotim/cvo/website-materials/2023-cmvrb-annual-report-final.pdf?sfvrsn=b86acf40_12022 CMVRB Annual Report final
is the Board’s responsibility to consider testimony or other evidence that supports modification, time during the proceedings, and only testimony and evidence pertinent to the Board’s action is allowed. Irrelevant and immaterial or unduly repetitious testimony or evidence is not permitted
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/cvotim/cvo/website-materials/2022-cmvrb-annual-report-final.pdf?sfvrsn=ab5b5b83_12024 CMVRB Annual Report Final
responsibility to consider testimony or other evidence that supports modification, cancellation, testimony and evidence pertinent to the Board’s action is allowed. Irrelevant and immaterial or unduly repetitious testimony or evidence is not permitted. In each case, after the conclusion of both
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/traffic/cvotim/cvo/website-materials/2024-cmvrb-annual-report-final.pdf?sfvrsn=d3776a96_19750000-723resp
. Salt Fog Test was split into two tests to avoid confusion with acceptance criteria, and adopted as edited in the document. Salt Fog Test was split into two tests to avoid confusion, tests specified in section 975-2.2. • 975-3 Galvanized Steel Coating System • 975-4 Paint, testing section) 1- Section 975-2.2 suggests 2 years of outdoor testing instead of 5 years. Although, testing. I also recommend adding a note that coatings used shall meet ASTM A780 Repair of damaged
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2023-24/review/comments-responses/9750000-723resp.pdf?sfvrsn=659b77f2_13460025SS
tests on the samples taken at 15 minute intervals from each batch. Continue sampling and testing, on the core samples or test cylinders. Submit the results of the laboratory trial batch tests, Department acceptance tests, which met all plastic and hardened concrete test requirements. (2) T h e c e, for permeability testing before mix design approval. Take the permeability test specimens from, at least 7 days prior to the scheduled 28 day test. The average permeability of the two tests, one test
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2005/files/3460025ss.pdf?sfvrsn=5afaabac_03460025SS
resistivity tests on the core samples or test cylinders. Submit the results of the laboratory trial batch tests and field demonstration of verified test data and inspection reports to the Engineer, along, acceptance tests, which met all plastic and hardened concrete test requirements. (2, for permeability testing before mix design approval. Take the permeability test specimens from, days prior to the scheduled 28 day test. The average permeability of the two tests, one test per
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2005/january-2005/workbook/3460025ss890bc8adbe8c4592879dec9bbf44dfbb.pdf?sfvrsn=af8270bd_0441700-1.Cove Rd from SR-76_Kanner Hwy to SR-5_US-1 GeoReport
testing. Laboratory test results are presented in the Appendix. Tests were performed in general accordance with the test methods noted Table 5.1 below. Table 5.1 – Soil Sample Testing Methods Test, Summary of Exfiltration Test Results USGS Topographic Map Summary of Laboratory Tests Soil Map, be expected among the borings. 4.3 Borehole Permeability (BHP) Test Results Five (5) BHP tests were, 4.3 Borehole Permeability (BHP) Test Results
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/cove-road-study/441700-1-cove-rd-from-sr-76_kanner-hwy-to-sr-5_us-1-georeport.pdf?sfvrsn=42e3d65b_11450300FHWA
will verify the QC tests results if the verification test results for pH tested in accordance with FM, Classification and Organic Content Testing: Perform soil classification tests on the sample collected, Classification, Organic Content, and pH Testing: The Engineer will verify the QC test results, ), and pH (FM 5-550) testing. Otherwise, the Engineer will test the sample retained in 145-6.2.1.1, will perform resolution testing. If the resolution test result satisfies the required gradation limits
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/fhwa/1450300fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=3bbb721a_16820102.comm
engineering department at Bosch, stating the following labs that you list for testing is no longer accurate do to the increase in speed: Since FDOT increased the wind test to 170 MPH their list of Acceptable Independent Test Lab is no longer accurate. The labs listed there only specify 150 MPH. http, with test labs capable? Response, previously approved cameras have been lab tested for wind velocity meeting the APL specification
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/6820102.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=e41b5ea7_06820102.resp
list for testing is no longer accurate do to the increase in speed: Since FDOT increased the wind test to 170 MPH their list of Acceptable Independent Test Lab is no longer accurate. The labs, /AcceptableIndependentTestLabList.shtm Will they update the list with test labs capable? Response: After further consideration, cameras have been lab tested for wind velocity meeting the APL specification below. Will TERL accept our calculations based on the previous wind velocity tests to substantiate our claim that our RISE
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/6820102.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=a3008593_03460902SL.impl
346 PORTLANDCEMENTCONCRETE–ACCEPTANCESAMPLING AND TESTING. (REV9-16-09)(FA11-9-09)(7-10) SUBARTICLE346-9.2(Pages334-335)isdeletedandthe following substituted: 346-9.2 Sampling Frequency for Quality Control Tests: Asaminimum, sample and test concrete of each design mix for water, , describe the method of sampling, testing and LOT numbering in the QC Plan. The Engineer will randomly, , and may perform additional Independent Verification tests. All QC activities, calculations
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul10/files/3460902sl.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=7e19c758_01250801.impl
the Engineer in writing prior to beginning construction of a test section. Construct a test section of the length of one LOT. Perform five quality control (QC) tests at random locations within the test section. All five tests must meet the density required by 125-9.2 and be verified by the Department, a QC test fails the requirements of 125-9.2 or when the QC tests cannot be verified, construct a new, then the Contractor must demonstrate with a successful test section that density can be achieved. Thick
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/implemented/1250801.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=81771897_0