4569 search results for Standard Specifications
4520900.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 4520900 Precast Segmental Bridge, Design Office to make verbiage consistent with current and future FDOT Standard Plan Indexes pending
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/4520900.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=18f39a79_09930206.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 9930206 Object Markers, Office to make verbiage consistent with current and future FDOT Standard Plan Indexes pending release
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/9930206.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=af3e0ee0_06200204.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 6200204 Grounding and Lighting Protection, to cover all grounding situations in the Standard Plans. Please share this proposal with others within
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/6200204.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=1a5a7ec2_01100700.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 1100700 Clearing and Grubbing, to make verbiage consistent with current and future FDOT Standard Plan Indexes pending release. Please
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/1100700.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=611b3fa8_21050806.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 1050806 Contractor Quality Control, Roadway Design Office to make verbiage consistent with current and future FDOT Standard Plan
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/1050806.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=fa3e62bb_24250607.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 4250607 Inlets, Manholes, , restore final road surface in accordance with the Design Standard Plans, Index No. 307125-001
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/4250607.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=6e7bceb_03460902.origind
ORIGINATION FORM Proposed Revisions to the Specifications (Please provide all information ‐ incomplete forms will be returned) Contact the State Specifications Office for assistance, /Subarticles: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes, , State Specifications Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Specification: 3460902 Portland Cement Concrete, to make verbiage consistent with current and future FDOT Standard Plan Indexes pending release
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/3460902.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=a14fa4cd_21050404-MM84VII.resp
“Specifications” has been added. Change made. 4. 8.4.5: Response: 5. 8.4.6.1: Response: All references to specifications have been placed in the plural. The word "standard" is not used for consistency with other chapters of the FDOT Standard Specifications and Materials Manual. Changes
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/january-2018/review/comments-responses/1050404-mm84vii.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=a8197ca2_0SPI-450-199
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data FY 2024-25 1 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Detailing Manual (SDM); Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations Use this standard in conjunction, not necessarily have to be the same value for a single beam. See the following sketch: Standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-450-199.pdf?sfvrsn=4f93ecc_1SPI-458-110
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System- Poured Joint with Backer Rod FY 2024-25 1 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System- Poured Joint with Backer Rod Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG, and shrinkage may be neglected. See Standard Plans Instructions for Index 458-100, Figures 1, of the joint. Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-458-110.pdf?sfvrsn=e8d0acc2_1SPI-450-199e
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data FY 2024-25 1 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Detailing Manual (SDM); Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations Use this standard in conjunction, not necessarily have to be the same value for a single beam. See the following sketch: Standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-450-199e.pdf?sfvrsn=f7a7cf5b_1E21C5
) in accordance with Standard Plans and Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction for median, of a Cashier's Check, the BDI Bid or Proposal Bond (Form No. 375-020-16), or the standard Bid or Proposal
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d2/lettings/2024/apr17/e21c5.pdf?sfvrsn=2b8c9b79_1SPI-450-199
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data FY 2025-26 1 Index 450-199 Prestressed I-Beams Build-Up & Deflection Data Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Detailing Manual (SDM); Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) Design Assumptions and Limitations Use this standard in conjunction, not necessarily have to be the same value for a single beam. See the following sketch: Standard
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-450-199.pdf?sfvrsn=3497a7d5_1SPI-458-110
Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System- Poured Joint with Backer Rod FY 2025-26 1 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System- Poured Joint with Backer Rod Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG, and shrinkage may be neglected. See Standard Plans Instructions for Index 458-100, Figures 1, of the joint. Standard Plans Instructions Topic No. 625-010-003 Index 458-110 Expansion Joint System
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-458-110.pdf?sfvrsn=51f768d2_14550701.comm
22600 Standard Plans, Index 455-001. ... provide minimal splices (add "...as provided for in Design, shown in the Plans to be extracted (add "...which are not extracted..." SUBARTICLE 455-30 Standard Plans, Index 120-001. I have never heard of this reference before, Standard Plans, Index 120-001. What is it referencing? It appears to be referencing the Specifications Section 120 but I am unaware
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2019/january-2019/review/comments-responses/4550701.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=b7d4ba7d_09920201.resp
added cost. The Value: UL 1449 is a safety standard for surge protection devices. Safety issues, for compliance with this standard?? Historical Data: HESCO/RLS has proudly been one of the primary, any time. Shane Hunt President Response: The proposed Specifications revision related to UL1449 was withdrawn. For future consideration, this comment will be forwarded to Ed Cashman, Standard Plans
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/9920201.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=e48c83b1_00050700.comm
) is used, we are eliminating the standard staking requirements (staking will be “as needed”). Without standard staking available, the Contractor must perform some level of calibration/checking, and accurately. We are simply asking for that plan. Without standard staking available for inspectors, and equipment calibration/checking requirements. Even though there are Specifications and Department
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/comments-responses/0050700.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=fc4bb538_00050700.resp
) is used, we are eliminating the standard staking requirements (staking will be “as needed”). Without standard staking available, the Contractor must perform some level of calibration/checking, and accurately. We are simply asking for that plan. Without standard staking available for inspectors, and equipment calibration/checking requirements. Even though there are Specifications and Department
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/comments-responses/0050700.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=44c5f10e_06530000.resp
appeared in the Minimum Specifications for Traffic Control Signals and Devices (MSTCSD) specification, after installation." Would recommend adding an additional resource, standard, or testing procedure, testing in 611-4 and standard inspection guidelines. Requirement in 653 for this functional check, , and operating." Response: This is standard language when items such as hardware, labor
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/comments-responses/6530000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=9b3da752_0Section62-100417
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Methods and Specifications, Philadelphia, , and Section 6 (Source of Supply–Steel) of the FDOT Standard Specifications. (C) Implement, . Advanced knowledge of the shop drawings, specifications, test methods, and Standard Indices, , Subpart B – Quality Assurance Procedures for Construction. Standard Plans for Road and Bridge
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/july-2017/materials-manual/section62-100417.pdf?sfvrsn=a9877d1d_1