9204 search results for test
D4300000.do
. The Engineer may require further testing of the pipe as a result of the inspection. If so directed by the Engineer, test pipe 36 inches [900 mm] and less in diameter using a mandrel. The mandrel, of a mandrel is selected as the means of further testing, the mandrels diameter, length, and other, requirements for the type of pipe installed, at no cost to the Department. Should the deflection test prove that the pipe met specifications, the Department will bear the cost of the deflection testing
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2003/january-2003/workbook/d4300000.do8f73ecc5797d441da28c7de19eefbc94.pdf?sfvrsn=5a3801bd_0SS4300000
testing of the pipe. If directed by the Engineer, test pipe using a mandrel. The mandrel shall, as the means of further testing, the mandrel’s diameter, length, and other requirements shall conform, for the type of pipe installed, at no cost to the Department. Should the deflection test prove that the pipe met specifications, the Department will bear the cost of the deflection testing, deflection of the certified actual mean diameter of the pipe being tested. The mandrel shall
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2007/january-2007/workbook/ss43000007889f24b640643be8d981bd6a57a5acf.pdf?sfvrsn=37cd03d5_0SS4300000
,laserprofiledpipethatindicatesdeflectionthatappearstobe inexcessofthatallowedbySpecification,theEngineermay require further testing of the pipe. If directed by the Engineer, test pipe using a mandrel. The mandrel shall be pulled by hand, testing, the mandrel’s diameter, length, and other requirements shall conform to 430-4.8.2. Remove, installed, at no cost to the Department. Should the deflection test prove that the pipe met specifications, the Department will bear the cost of the deflection testing. TheEngineermay waive
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2009/january-2009/workbook/ss4300000.pdf?sfvrsn=634fe8a3_0MPOAC-Staff-Directors-Power-Point-August-02-2018
protocol • AV may move from testing to use within ten years • Challenge: Decades of mixed traffic, governments • Early focus on regulating AV testing, not future public operation • Broad range, equipment Pre‐deployment testing at the Traffic Engineering Research Laboratory (TERL, a real‐world Test Bed facility where FDOT can collaborate and assist the industry to demonstrate and evaluate a wide range of connected vehicle solutions. Goal To test and evaluate different
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/mpoac_website/meetings/2018/mpoac-staff-directors-power-point-august-02-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=3bb97d5f_12026FPDM
to expedite LBR testing under certain conditions. Use of this test method is at the option, within the empirical limits of the AASHO Road Test. If a stabilized subgrade is not constructed due, alternates to in-situ sampling and testing to determine the Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) value of a stabilized subgrade include: • Mixing of soil and stabilized material and testing off site. • Use, been tested at the source. • Use of a Predesigned Stabilized Subgrade per a Special Provision
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/pm/publications/2026fpdm.pdf?sfvrsn=872fc1af_1chgtab
the exception for Type III Cement and to update ASTM testing reference and psi requirement, for testing cylinders. Also, there is 6 SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS REV DATE FA DATE LETTING, ADDED CHANGED DELETED requirements for a shear transfer mechanism and delete the testing, . To provide a verification and resolution process for organic testing. Also, a change to a reference, the specification with new information and requirements from the recently revised AASHTO M-85 test method
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2008/files/chgtab.pdf?sfvrsn=b96c0efe_0Dec15
commitments to a Government Agency, add new dynamic testing test pile pay items that are associated, requires all 455-34 piles to use either internal or external 100% Dynamic Testing. The contractors, table below. Discovery of errors: Legislative change requiring the testing of all piles. Estimate Effect: for Dynamic Testing (+) approximately $1 mill added to the official estimate. However, all, Newsletter For sediment barrier (+) approximately $75,000.00 added to official estimate; For Test Pile
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/news/d3/dec15.pdf?sfvrsn=7835f62d_04710000.FHWA
and a maximum span to depth ration of 20:1. 2. Three-point bending tests are acceptable. 3. Test a minimum, span to depth ration of 20:1. 2. Three-point bending tests are acceptable. 3. Test a minimum of 10, ), respectively; test criteria for RTSS and TSS have been revised slightly. Please review and transmit
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/fhwa/4710000.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=16e3505e_0AD 27123 - 444634-3 Scope of Services - Stage 2
Testing o9.3 - Highway Materials Testing o9.4.1 - Standard Foundation Studies o15.0 - Landscape, and test the project components. These Contract Documents will be used by the DEPARTMENT or its
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/procuement_marketingd1/documents/fy26-27/ad--27123/ad-27123---444634-3-scope-of-services---stage-2.docx?sfvrsn=8a839692_1sukanekC
; monitor on-site material sampling and testing; coordinate off-site inspections; review of shop, and testing; review of shop drawings; preparation and approval of payment certificates; preparation, material testing, coordinating offsite inspection, review of shop drawings, preparation, of contractor’s schedules, pay requests, contractor’s costs for additional work tasks, and testing, , sampling and on-site material testing, review of shop drawings, preparation and approval
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/resume/sukanekc.pdf?sfvrsn=db7d6fef_01050502RESPON
to the 105 spec and I do not feel that this is needed. The people performing the testing, testing, verification people are present. All CQC testing is done under the watchful eye, erasures...’ refer to the original testing and material sampling forms submitted or is this applicable, to original testing and materials sampling forms. No need to mention strictly enforced. Erasures
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul06/files/1050502respon.pdf?sfvrsn=f31d30f6_05611003.resp2
analysis, or actual testing. In 1998 Columbia University performed such testing for Total, as the floor of a suspended platform. I am not aware of any structural analysis or empirical testing, ’s engineer to effectively demonstrate (through analysis or testing) that their proposed platform, and inconsistent metallurgy and unreliable breaking strengths. Testing of such Chinese hardware has
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul12/files/5611003.resp2.pdf?sfvrsn=b3a85d8b_0BMRM Chapter 9
practice for the crash testing of safety hardware devices for use on the National Highway System (NHS, tested system such as a Jersey-type barrier (see Figure 9.1), if the structure can carry, and unacceptable vehicular decelerations. When a portion of the test vehicle, such as a wheel, engages, of them be tested for pullout resistance. Bonded anchor systems include the following: 1. Drill, testing, particularly since it may slowly deformation over time. Installation instructions particular
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/maintenance/str/bi/reference-manual/bmrm-chapter-9.pdf?sfvrsn=ac1e4b9f_0Chapter 9: Railing Systems and Safety Features
practice for the crash testing of safety hardware devices for use on the National Highway System (NHS, tested system such as a Jersey-type barrier (see Figure 9.1), if the structure can carry, and unacceptable vehicular decelerations. When a portion of the test vehicle, such as a wheel, engages, of them be tested for pullout resistance. Bonded anchor systems include the following: 1. Drill, testing, particularly since it may slowly deformation over time. Installation instructions particular
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/str/bi/reference-manual/chapter-9-railing-systems-and-safety-features.pdf?sfvrsn=50ee8425_0DCE03-16
policy already requires that all hardware that has not been successfully crash tested and evaluated
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/construction/memos/2016/dce03-16.pdf?sfvrsn=c4503d54_0DCE22-18
4x8 cylinders to be tested at 28-days by the Concrete Producer’s or the Contractor's qualified
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/memos/2018/dce22-18.pdf?sfvrsn=79fae0f6_49920104.impl
be vibration tested in accordance with NEMA C136.31
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul13/files/9920104.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=76b4123a_0SS4500902
concrete beam and slab units to deviate from a true plane by more than 1/8 inch when tested in all
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2011/files/ss4500902.pdf?sfvrsn=772771e1_0SS9920104
fixtures. Pendant mounted fixtures shall be vibration tested in accordance with NEMA C136.31
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2013/files/ss9920104.pdf?sfvrsn=fcc8af53_0SS5230201.IMP
with the manufacturer’s specifications and procedures has been tested in accordance with the ASTM E-274
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan07/files/ss5230201.imp.pdf?sfvrsn=41225e3f_0