9037 search results for test

23P-010 ATC Final Report Signed

determined ATC was compliant with the four required documentation areas and reports tested, in accordance, the period tested, CY 2022, ATC reported 92 active tenants. Attachment 2 shows a list of sites, available towers at the time of the audit. The testing results concluded with recommendations, with the Agreement for CY 2022. 2. If ATC was compliant with the four required documentation and reports tested, audit testing of the revenues reported by ATC. The quarterly revenue report contained data for each

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/ig/reports/23p-010-atc-final-report-signed.pdf?sfvrsn=eef6ba0f_1

3370302-724origind

in accordance with AASHTO T 312 and FM 1-T 209 (and conditioning prior to testing) will not be required, testing will be required for these mixtures. Table 337-34 FC-5 Master Production Range, for sample size of n = 1 from the verified mix design 337-6.2.1 Individual Test Tolerances for FC-5, individual test result of a sublot for asphalt binder content does not meet the requirements of Table 337-34, 2.Two consecutive test results within the same LOT for gradation on any of the following

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2024-25/review/internal/3370302-724origind.pdf?sfvrsn=e10c54a9_2

26C-004 FTE Section 129(a)(9) Financial Review FY 2024-25 (Over-the-Road Buses)

determined the FTE’s 10 toll facilities tested complied in all material respects with subsection 129(a)(9, Due to the high volume of transactions, to perform this testing we judgmentally selected a 3-hour, Schedule As part of our testing, we reviewed all 72,161 transactions to verify the billing system, ; and  reviewing and testing the Department’s tolling facilities transactions. Docusign Envelope ID

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/ig/reports/26c-004-fte-section-129(a)(9)-financial-review-fy-2024-25-(over-the-road-buses).pdf?sfvrsn=c51fc804_1

SP6490000

% of the specified 28-day concrete strength and verifying test results have been provided to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested, of 20 to 30 seconds. Test the grout fluidity using ASTM C939 Flow Cone Method. Discard any grout

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/janworkbook2015/files/sp6490000.pdf?sfvrsn=36328c06_4

6490000.origind

the foundation has achieved 70% of the specified 28 day concrete strength and verifying test results have been provided to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM C39. Before erecting the pole, clean, time of 20 to 30 seconds. Test the grout fluidity using ASTM C939 Flow Cone Method. Discard any

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/internal/6490000.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=6e8f6a2e_0

6490000.impl

% of the specified 28 day concrete strength and verifying test results have been provided to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM C39. Before erecting the pole, clean the top, to a fluid state with an efflux time of 20 to 30 seconds. Test the grout fluidity using ASTM C939 Flow

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/implemented/6490000.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=1cd63ee1_0

6490000-Man02.impl

% of the specified 28-day concrete strength and verifying test results have been provided to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested, of 20 to 30 seconds. Test the grout fluidity using ASTM C939 Flow Cone Method. Discard any grout

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/implemented/6490000-man02.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=b69450b4_0

5610401.origind

operations and submit the test results to the Engineer within 72 hours of sampling. Report sample results, and test reports no later than 72 hours after collection of samples. 561-11.4WasteIdentification:Collectsamples in accordance with EPA SW 846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical, each waste stream is sampled, tested, and classified, additional sampling and analysis, laboratory to be tested for arsenic, barium, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, lead, mercury, selenium

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/internal/5610401.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=d260ec8_0

GantJ

engineering, inspection, materials testing, contract administration, scheduling, change orders, claims, to large ovens and sensitive test instruments. Managed on- site engineering, equipment installation and testing, scheduling and cost control. Supervised three branch heads coordinating in- house, tests; inspection and certifications for occupancy; and coordination and oversight

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/resume/gantj.pdf?sfvrsn=9a0764c2_0

0060600comm

, Testing, and Reporting Guide 21 calendar days prior to commencement of construction. Provide an up, additional materials placed. Do not commence work activities that require testing until the Job Guide, items and quantities. List the materials and quantities in the same format as the Sampling, Testing, or the request may be denied. Do not commence work activities that require testing, until the Job, to the STRG requirement. The specifications outline the testing frequency, what is the point

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan08/files/0060600comm.pdf?sfvrsn=8b1f057_0

BMRM Appendix C

Society for Testing and Materials AWPA American Wood Protection Association ACZA Ammonical Copper, Evaluation MFP Magnetic Field Perturbation Testing MFL Magnetic flux leakage MT Magnetic-Particle Testing MMS Maintenance Management Systems MASH Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware MUTCD Manual, Non-Destructive Testing OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OBPA Ogdensburg Bridge, Velocity USW Ultrasonic Surface Waves UT Ultrasonic Testing USACE United States Army Corps

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/maintenance/str/bi/reference-manual/bmrm-appendix-c.pdf?sfvrsn=61a70496_0

Appendix C

Society for Testing and Materials AWPA American Wood Protection Association ACZA Ammonical Copper, Evaluation MFP Magnetic Field Perturbation Testing MFL Magnetic flux leakage MT Magnetic-Particle Testing MMS Maintenance Management Systems MASH Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware MUTCD Manual, Non-Destructive Testing OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OBPA Ogdensburg Bridge, Velocity USW Ultrasonic Surface Waves UT Ultrasonic Testing USACE United States Army Corps

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/str/bi/reference-manual/appendix-c.pdf?sfvrsn=ef9c6372_0

AMLC Meeting 9 07-15-09

and has not had sufficient real-world testing. Also, the AMLC expressed that it is crucial, more real-world testing using an unchanging version. Furthermore, since Districts were not given an instruction manual or hands-on training on how to use the AMMP system (part of the testing was observing how different Districts filled out the AMMP in different ways), much better testing data, and will be trained before using the final AMMP for this final year testing period. These steps will provide

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/maintenance/cont/amlc_minutes/amlc-meeting-9-07-15-09.pdf?sfvrsn=b98b79a0_0

6710000.resp

this functionality. There likely needs to be some testing of backward compatibility with the common, vendors internal functions (Clock, Comms, Data Storage). There may be no issue at all but, testing, of backwards compatibility testing. Response: The intent of the revision is to require all new, so far has only included testing the controllers to ensure they can log data locally, in the research and testing or in the use of the high resolution data. FDOT installed its own

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/comments-responses/6710000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=5ec2691_0

Chapter10s4

of these contaminants is determined by using a Soluble Salts Test Kit. Testing is performed after washing, cured and prior to application of finish coats. 4) Testing f or chloride, sulfate and n i t r ate concentrations: Testing f or the presences of chlorides, sulfates and nitrates on surfaces, this testing process in order t o perform Contractor verification. See Section 560-7.5 and 561-6.5, for this testing. 5) Stripe Coating: Specifications 560-9.7 and 561-8.7 require the stripe coating

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/manuals/cpam/newcleanchapters/chapter10s4.pdf?sfvrsn=df04de1e_0

Chapter10s4Redline

of these contaminants is determined by using a Soluble Salts Test Kit. Testing is performed after, the Department or with the Engineer of Record to determine how best to seal these gaps. 4) Testing f or chloride, sulfate and n i t r ate concentrations: Testing f or the presences of chlorides, sulfates, about this testing process in order t o perform Contractor verification. See Section 560-7.5 and 561-6.5, for this testing. 5) Stripe Coating: Specifications 560-9.7 and 561-8.7 requires the stripe

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/manuals/cpam/newhistory/chapter10s4redline.pdf?sfvrsn=7c0a4982_0

Plastic and Composites Materials Program-Alex Lewis, EI

& Testing (the “sample” is just documentation submitted to MAC) • Notarized Material Certificate from, Method of Acceptance Sampling & Testing What to look for Printed Label, inkjet marking, of Acceptance Sampling & Testing What to look for Printed Label, inkjet marking, documentation, Enterprises • Prinsco Project Method of Acceptance Sampling & Testing What to look for Printed Label, & Testing What to look for Printed Label, inkjet marking, documentation, defects Wall Zone eligible

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/training/2025-fall-construction-academy/plastic-and-composites-materials-program-alex-lewis-ei.pdf?sfvrsn=ccb99f77_1

GL-10D

] 8.GroutsmustbeontheAPLandbemixedwiththespecifiedwater;fluiditymustbemaintained per manufacturer’s limits; wick induced bleed tests, . 462-6, 923, 938] 9. PTSystems must be approved by the State Structures Design Office and required test, h e s e t e s ts may be required: Tendon Modulus of Elasticity Test (optional), In Place Wobble or Friction Test (required for tendons longer then 100’). [Spec. 462-8] PROTECTION OF PT STEEL 12. P, . [Spec. 462-7] 22. When required by the Engineer, the duct system must be pressure tested before

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/construction/constadm/guidelist/inspectguidelist/fy1516/gl-10d.pdf?sfvrsn=3c63f790_0
20 of 9037 results