9199 search results for test
D1US17DrivewaySidewalkWork
reviewing all the data and listening to the testimony we have determined that there is entitlement to FPC
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/decision/d1/2007/d1us17drivewaysidewalkwork.pdf?sfvrsn=1b546f96_2D3_E3E19_417474-2_I-10BridgeReplace_GrindingGroovingIssue
. Both parties gave testimony to clarify written documents. 2 PERTINENT CONTRACT PROVISIONS 1-3
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/decision/d3/0708/d3_e3e19_417474-2_i-10bridgereplace_grindinggroovingissue.pdf?sfvrsn=27366e30_2GomezJ
interchange at SR-80. Provided expert witness testimony on behalf of the Department as to public need
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/resume/gomezj.pdf?sfvrsn=bf6f8983_0D1US17ArchCulvertWork
at the hearing held on 12 July, 2007. After reviewing all the data and listening to the testimony we have
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/decision/d1/2007/d1us17archculvertwork.pdf?sfvrsn=4e417ebb_2Noteworthy-Practices-agenda-package-Jan-30-2019
of the proceedings is made which record includes testimony and evidence upon which appeal is to be based
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/mpoac_website/meetings/2019/noteworthy-practices-agenda-package-jan-30-2019.pdf?sfvrsn=1e10b745_14500000.comm
strength by testing the compressive strength test cylinders. Make a minimum of two compressive strength release test cylinders daily for each individual mix, or for each LOT of 50 cubic yard, otherwise in the plans. Verify the release strength by compressive strength cylinder tests or other, strength is developed. In lieu of every 24 hour testing, the contractor is permitted to estimate, velocity method in accordance with ASTM C 597, or any other nondestructive test method acceptable
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan12/files/4500000.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=18560574_0D1040005.do
of sustaining a maximum design velocity of 6.5 ft/sec [2 m/sec] as determined from tests performed by Utah State University, Texas Transportation Institute or an independent testing laboratory approved by the Department. Furnish to the Engineer, two certified copies of manufacturers test reports showing, 4 by 8 inch [100 by 200 mm] samples for product identification. The manufacturers test records
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2004/january-2004/workbook/d1040005.do819ee6a25dd84cac9f5e709f2c0697e7.pdf?sfvrsn=d8ec4b5f_06490200FHWA
and verifying test results have been submitted to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM, and verifying test results have been submitted to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM C39. Before
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2025-26/review/fhwa/6490200fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=9b2e9d89_16490202FHWA
concrete strength and verifying test results have been submitted to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31, test results have been submitted to the Engineer. Determine concrete strength from tests on a minimum of two test cylinders prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM C39. Before
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/fhwa/6490202fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=702e6219_10060009IMP
1 006 CONTROLOFMATERIALS–DEFECTIVEMATERIALS. (REV9-27-05)(FA12-6-05)(7-06) ARTICLE6-11(oftheSupplemental Specifications) is deleted and the following substituted: 6-11 Defective Materials. Allmaterials not meeting the requirements of these Specifications; segregated materials, even though previously tested and approved; materials that are or have been improperly stored; and materials that are mixed with an excess of clay, coal, sticks, burlap, hay, straw, loam or earth, or other
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul06/files/0060009imp.pdf?sfvrsn=edee8cea_09320205.FHWA
. The finished pads shall withstand a minimum uniform compressive load of 1200 psi when tested in accordance, of 2,400 psi when tested in accordance with FM 5-598. 932-2.5.3 Certification: The Contractor shall, . The finished pads shall withstand a minimum uniform compressive load of 1200 psi when tested in accordance, load of 2,400 psi when tested in accordance with FM 5-598. 932-2.5.3 Certification: The Contractor
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/january-2018/review/fhwa/9320205.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=c1292ff3_0Lake Mary Boulevard CV
Search Lake Mary Boulevard CV Project The Lake Mary Boulevard CV project deployed and tested connected vehicle technology and applications along seven signalized intersections from International Parkway to Rinehart Road in Lake Mary, Florida. The CV applications include Signal Phase and Timing, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption, and Traveler
https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/teo-divisions.shtm/cav-ml-stamp/cv/maplocations/lake-mary-boulevard-cvUS 17-92 Connected Vehicle Deployment
Search U.S. 17-92 Connected Vehicle Deployment The US 17-92 CV project deployed, and tested connected vehicle technology and applications along five signalized intersections from Beresford Ave to Firehouse Rd in DeLand, Florida. The CV applications include Signal Phase and Timing, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption, and Traveler Information Message
https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/teo-divisions.shtm/cav-ml-stamp/cv/maplocations/us-17-92-connected-vehicle-deployment7410000.FHWA
only those sensors that pass the pre- installation test. After installation, repeat the tests, numbering information will be as specified in the Design Standards Index 17900. 741-2.3, Test Requirements for Type I Axle Sensors: Perform the manufacturer’s recommended on-site pre-installation test to determine the sensor’s condition using an LCRInductive/Capacitance/Resistance meter. Testing, as determined by the sensor manufacturer. Install only those sensors that pass the pre- installation test
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul12/files/7410000.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=948d1c50_09480107.FHWA
to bind the manufacturing company. Ensure that the pipe joints have been tested at the plant hydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and witnessed by the Engineer. Ensure that the pipe joints have been tested at the plant hydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and shown to meet the requirements of Section 6.2, . Ensurethatthepipejointshavebeentestedattheplanthydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and witnessed by the Engineer
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul08/files/9480107.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=5031cf58_09480107.fhwa
to bind the manufacturing company. Ensure that the pipe joints have been tested at the plant hydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and witnessed by the Engineer. Ensure that the pipe joints have been tested at the plant hydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and shown to meet the requirements of Section 6.2, . Ensurethatthepipejointshavebeentestedattheplanthydrostatically at the specified pressure using test methods in ASTM D 3212 and witnessed by the Engineer
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul08/files/9480107.fhwab8793a186bd646c3a8aa40e780a718e6.pdf?sfvrsn=e9f85b24_05270000.FHWA
tested in accordance with the following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance FM 3-C1028, tested in accordance with the indicated Standard appropriate to the material.following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance FM 3-C1028 Dry Coefficient of Friction – 0.8 min. Wet, Jobs PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE * Applies only to plastic materials. ** Applies only, and include certified test reports from an independent lab showing the product meets the requirements
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/january-2014/review/fhwa/5270000.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=6e74fbe3_05270000.FHWA(REVISED)
tested in accordance with the following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance FM 3-C1028, that meet the following minimum material property requirements when tested in accordance with the indicated Standard appropriate to the material.following: PROPERTY STANDARD TEST VALUE Slip Resistance, Sheet (MSDS) Non-Hazardous, per RCRA Subtitle C 5270000.D01 All Jobs PROPERTY STANDARD TEST, on the QPL shall submit an application in accordance with Section 6 and include certified test reports
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/january-2014/review/fhwa/5270000.fhwa(revised).pdf?sfvrsn=c4f9250c_09260100.impl
tensioning anchorage protection systems. *Accepted by APL **Accepted by certified test report, PSE epoxies shall submit performance test reports from the National Transportation Product, of all other types shall submit test data from an independent laboratory showing that the product, in accordance with the specific directions of the manufacturer. 926-3.2 Performance Tests: Meet, as determined by the following standard ASTM test methods. Property Test Value Test Method Compressive
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/july-2017/review/implemented/9260100.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=dffcb345_09710900.comm
.” Testing of wet weather pavement marking systems should be tested in accordance with the most, ” 1.2.1 Discussion—This test condition typically exists (1) after a rainfall has ended, performance obtained with this test in conditions of wetness does not necessarily relate to how, column and replaces with Reflective Elements. Under Test Method, it still makes reference, .) being used now and on future QPL striping materials do not meet. This test method needs to be removed
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan11/files/9710900.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=6d32e5ca_0