13207 search results for DESIGN

fm5-548

 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION State Materials Office 5007 NE 39 th Avenue Gainesville, Florida 32609 December 9, 2014 FM 5-548 1 Florida Method of Test for VISCOSITY OF ASPHALT RUBBER BY ROTATIONAL (DIP-N-READ) VISCOMETER Designation: FM 5-548 1. SCOPE This test method outlines a procedure for determining the v iscosity of asphalt rubber by rotational viscometer. 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS ASTM Standards: E 1 Standard Specification for ASTM Liquid-in-Glass Thermometers

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/administration/resources/library/publications/fstm/methods/fm5-548.pdf?sfvrsn=5cc78cd5_3

9160300-723impl

test (AASHTO T 315) shall be 67ºC. 3. All PG asphalt binders having a high temperature designation, temperature designation higher than PG 67 shall only be produced with a styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS, of 916-2.1.1. 7. All PG asphalt binders having a high temperature designation of PG 67 or lower shall, temperature designation >67 will be tested at 67°C. PG 76-22 (PMA) and PG 76-22 (ARB) shall pass a “V

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2023-24/review/implemented/9160300-723impl.pdf?sfvrsn=7be568a3_2

9160201-122impl

designation of PG 67 or lower shall be prepared without modification. 4. All PMA binders having a high temperature designation higher than PG 67 shall only be produced with a styrene-butadiene-styrene, of 916-2.1.1. 7. All PG asphalt binders having a high temperature designation of PG 67 or lower, ) All binders with a high temperature designation >67 will be tested at 67°C. PG 76-22 (PMA) and PG

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2022/january-2022/review/implemented/9160201-122impl.pdf?sfvrsn=1dd972b4_2

STIP Federal AC Program

financed with state funds and carry the "AC" designation in the STIP detail project listings

https://www.fdot.gov/workprogram/federal/stip-federalacprogram.shtm

245 - Aviation

. For example, ponds constructed near airports, specifically in the flight path, should be designed, 110.5.1 of the FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and may require an Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/designsupport/pmresources/245---aviation.pdf?sfvrsn=301f7a7e_1

Useful Links

and development processes. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) AASHTOWare Safety Analyst is a Software as a Service (SaaS) platform specifically designed to meet the unique

https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/trafficservices/strides2zero/useful-links

Florida Rock-Clay Scour Procedure

INDEX A-Z Search Roadway Design Florida Rock-Clay Scour Procedure The Florida Rock /Clay Scour Procedure is designed to account for the scour resistance of cemented strata, rock, and clay. The test methods establish the shear stress response of soils and the procedure integrates that response over the lifetime

https://www.fdot.gov/roadway/drainage/fla-rockclay-proc.shtm

FGB Sub-Committee Meetings - February 2025 - Chapter 1, 3, 14, 15, 16, and 19

language in the design criteria that designs should prevent fatalities and serious injuries,  Florida Greenbook Subcommittee Meeting Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Design Office 1 Subcommittee Meeting Minutes Chapters 1, 3, 14, 15, 16 and 19 Monday, February 10, Greenbook Subcommittee Meeting Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways Florida Department of Transportation – Roadway Design Office 2 As part

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/floridagreenbook/fgb-sub-committee-meetings---february-2025---chapter-1-3-14-15-16-and-19.pdf?sfvrsn=e6b9db2e_1

7111000.origind

: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Structures Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision involve PPM changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision, necessitate any of the following: Design Bulletin Construction Bulletin Estimates Bulletin Materials Bulletin, the unmarked gaps for skip and dotted lines. The gross mile measurement will not include designated unmarked

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/7111000.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=e7e9221d_0

7101000.origind

: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Structures Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision involve PPM changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision, necessitate any of the following: Design Bulletin Construction Bulletin Estimates Bulletin Materials Bulletin, measurement will not include designated unmarked lengths at intersections, turn lanes, etc. Final

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/7101000.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=77d2b7d8_0

7091000.origind

: Telephone: email: Will the proposed revision involve Design Standard Index changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Structures Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision involve PPM changes? Yes No Roadway Design staff contacted (name): Will the proposed revision, necessitate any of the following: Design Bulletin Construction Bulletin Estimates Bulletin Materials Bulletin, for skip and dotted lines. The gross mile measurement will not include designated unmarked lengths

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/internal/7091000.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=e3bade38_0

SPI-536-002

for Existing Bridges Design Criteria NCHRP Report 350 ; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 6th Edition, Section 13; AASHTO Roadside Design Guide , 4 th Edition; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) ; FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations Index 536-002, roadside hazards, extend the guardrail following the Length-of-Need method of the AASHTO Roadside Design, reinforcing steel as a project specific design. Thus, some degree of variability can be expected

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-536-0024b514c34-866f-4b00-b804-27732c414337.pdf?sfvrsn=813846c0_1

SPI-536-002

for Existing Bridges Design Criteria NCHRP Report 350 ; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 6th Edition, Section 13; AASHTO Roadside Design Guide , 4 th Edition; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG) ; FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations Index 536-002, roadside hazards, extend the guardrail following the Length-of-Need method of the AASHTO Roadside Design, reinforcing steel as a project specific design. Thus, some degree of variability can be expected

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2027/spi/spi-536-002.pdf?sfvrsn=11abe877_1
20 of 13207 results