9191 search results for test

SS3501401

in compliance with 350-14.1.1. If the results from the impact-echo test vary by ± 0.15 inches from the core boring, then the non-destructive test method can not be used on the pavement. In such case

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2007/files/ss3501401.pdf?sfvrsn=28bb4d22_0

3501401.impl

in compliance with 350-14.1.1. If the results from the impact-echo test vary by ± 0.15 inches from the core boring, then the non-destructive test method can not be used on the pavement. In such case

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul07/files/3501401.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=bdfb4b9d_0

SS3501401

in compliance with 350-14.1.1. If the results from the impact-echo test vary by ± 0.15 inches from the core boring, then the non-destructive test method can not be used on the pavement. In such case

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2007/files/ss3501401944737e36ee3409597f231499a5b9052.pdf?sfvrsn=48c5ff51_0

2006_Load_Rating_Manual_10-19-06

to be load tested it must be on the load test candidate list. 850-010-035-b Page17of34 SECTION 4, OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING 3. General 3.1 Routine Analysis with Line Model Programs 3.2 Analysis with 2D or 3D Programs 3.3 Limited Material Test to Augment Analysis 3.4 Full Scale Load Test SECTION 4, principles, recognized formulae, computer programs, or load tests. Such judgment should be used, structurebasedonitscurrentconditionthroughanalysis and Engineering Judgment. Load tests may be used

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/maintenance/str/lr/2006_load_rating_manual_10-19-06.pdf?sfvrsn=2f98ee51_0

6630000.FHWA

and visible. 663-3.1 Field Testing: Subject the system to field acceptance tests (FATs). Develop and submit a test plan for FATs to the Engineer for approval. The Engineer reserves the right to witness, and visible. 663-3.1 Field Testing: Subject the system to field acceptance tests (FATs). Develop, . Detector cards must include a test switch that can be used to manually generate detector calls, being subjected to the environmental testing procedures described in NEMA TS2, Sections 2.2.7

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/fhwa/6630000.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=d91d2d7_0

9711000.impl

test specimen 6 by 1 by 0.05 minimum thickness shall be tested at a temperature range of 40, a minimum elongation of 25% when tested in accordance with ASTM D 638. 971-8.9 Plastic Pull test, coat at which the product passes testing may be placed on the QPL. When listed, will be obtained in accordance with the Department’s Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide Schedule, contain no more than 3.0 ppm lead by weight in a cured state when tested by EPA methods 3050 and 6010

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan09/files/9711000.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=c31378a6_0

SS1200700

construction of a test section. Construct a test section of the length of one full LOT. Perform five QC tests at random locations within the test section. All five QC tests and a Department Verification test must meet the density required by 120-10.2. Identify the test section with the compaction effort, classification, failing QC test or when the QC tests cannot be verified, construct a new test section, , after having demonstrated with a successful test section, the possession and control of compacting

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2007/january-2007/workbook/ss1200700.pdf?sfvrsn=8b37fe3b_0

4620400.impl

strength of the prestressing steel, when tested in an unbonded state, without exceeding, with the “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications”. Test and provide written certification that anchorages meet or exceed the testing requirements in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, D 3895 of not less than 20 minutes. Perform OIT test on samples taken from the finished product. Test the remolded finished polyolefin material for stress crack resistance using ASTM F 2136

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul09/files/4620400.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=a24655a8_0

9320300.FHWA

reinforcing bars shall meet the requirements of ACI 440.6 following the test methods from ACI 440.3. Use, with this Specification must submit test reports conducted by an independent laboratory, qualified by an ISO 17025 accreditation agency, using personnel with actual experience running the test methods for FRP reinforcing bars. Submit the test reports to the State Materials Office. Table 3-2 Additional Requirements for Qualification of Producers of FRP Reinforcing Bars Property Test M e t h o d R e

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/fhwa/9320300.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=91f75814_0

spi-550-013

, Test Level 3 Criteria; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications ; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG, of railing mounted with tension wires) is based on a similar design that was successfully crash tested in accordance with the AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings Performance Level 2 pickup test. Modifications have been made to improve the crashworthiness to NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2019/spi/spi-550-013.pdf?sfvrsn=d44f8fcd_6

SPI-550-013

, Test Level 3 Criteria; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications ; Structures Design Guidelines (SDG, of railing mounted with tension wires) is based on a similar design that was successfully crash tested in accordance with the AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings Performance Level 2 pickup test. Modifications have been made to improve the crashworthiness to NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2020/spi/spi-550-013.pdf?sfvrsn=f37747dd_2

SPI-550-013

Report 350, Test Level 3 Criteria; AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; Structures Design, crash tested in accordance with the AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings Performance Level 2 pickup test. Modifications have been made to improve the crashworthiness to NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3 Criteria. This fence can be used on Index, 521-422, 521-423, 521-427, 521-428 and 521-480

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2027/spi/spi-550-013.pdf?sfvrsn=24d3d760_1

SPI-521-600

throughout this standard series was successfully crash tested at Terre Armee International (France). See report "Field Test of a "GBA" Safety Barrier Erected on a Reinforced Earth Wall", May, 1982. The details on Index 521-610, 521-611 and 521-620 are generally applicable for a TL-4 crash test rating with the 36" single-slope concrete barriers, and for a TL-5 crash test rating with the 42" single

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2027/spi/spi-521-600.pdf?sfvrsn=7ce57f3d_1

5480000.resp

or testing agency. Ensure test data includes all sizes and types of soil reinforcement to be utilized, connection capacity testing. Tests must be performed in accordance with ASTM D6638 to determine the short, in a lab with conventional testing protocols, hence remains somewhat of an unknown. Response: Agree, content testing is only required on metallic reinforcement. pH testing is required for all, Approved Product List (APL) a. Opening Paragraph: What is “independently certified test reports

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/comments-responses/5480000.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=894c8cbd_0

3301200.origind

f o r m all straightedge testing in accordance with FM 5-509 with one pass of the rolling straightedge operated along the outside wheel path of each lane being tested. The Engineer may require additional testing at other locations within the lane. 330-12.4.3 T r a f f i c C o ntrol: Provide, all testing. When traffic control cannot be provided in accordance with Index Nos. 607 or 619, submit, control in the Contract bid prices for the asphalt items. 330-12.4.4 Process Control Testing: Assume

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul07/files/3301200.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=b8c7f3db_0

4620425.fhwa

Structures Office to remove the requirements for a shear transfer mechanism and delete the testing, that steel pipes used in the tendon anchorage zones are equipped with a shear transfer mechanism. Test, % of the tendon GUTS in a shear transfer pull-out test described below: Shear Transfer Mechanism Pullout Test Procedure: 1) Cast Anchorage, Shear Transfer Mechanism and Duct in a test block of concrete, into test block. 6) Record lowest transfer force measured over a sustained period of one hour. 4620425

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul08/files/4620425.fhwafd49e6305a664c599dd4f3e2b40a45e5.pdf?sfvrsn=ba873095_0

4620425.origind

. ThischangewasproposedbyCharlesBoydoftheStateStructuresOfficeto remove the requirements for a shear transfer mechanism and delete the testing, in the tendon anchorage zones are equipped with a shear transfer mechanism. Test and provide written, transfer pull-out test described below: Shear Transfer Mechanism Pullout Test Procedure: 1) Cast Anchorage, Shear Transfer Mechanism and Duct in a test block of concrete with minimum dimensions of 2’-6, head and transfer tendon force through grout/shear transfer mechanism into test block. 6) Record

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul08/files/4620425.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=2bd0316c_0

4620425.FHWA

Structures Office to remove the requirements for a shear transfer mechanism and delete the testing, that steel pipes used in the tendon anchorage zones are equipped with a shear transfer mechanism. Test, % of the tendon GUTS in a shear transfer pull-out test described below: Shear Transfer Mechanism Pullout Test Procedure: 1) Cast Anchorage, Shear Transfer Mechanism and Duct in a test block of concrete, into test block. 6) Record lowest transfer force measured over a sustained period of one hour. 4620425

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul08/files/4620425.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=713d302a_0

5560200.comm

or service life. (How does one insure joints are air-tight? Is testing pressure testing now required for all casings?) Response: There are various methods to pressure test a casing, and will not be identified in the specification. Pressure testing has always been required; this is not a new requirement

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul12/files/5560200.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=e4ad58e7_0

9920201.comm

triple the current cost of the product. Costs include: a. Initial Testing Depending upon which NRTL (Nationally Recognized Test Laboratory) you select, testing may cost between $15,000 and $40,000. That cost is per model. For instance: testing HESCO/RLS HE120, HE240, and HE480 highway lighting

https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2018/july-2018/review/comments-responses/9920201.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=8a955703_0
20 of 9191 results