9191 search results for test
9210100.comm
to Specification 346, the Florida Test Method 5-578 or FM 5-578, is being replaced by AASHTO T 358, ? As a philosophical question, if the AASHTO method for testing concrete resistivity is preferred over, prepared a graph presenting data from round robin testing showing the relationship between 7-day, test methods in the table above. Response, in the test methods and in the correlation between C186 and C1702. Therefore, it cannot be assumed
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/comments-responses/9210100.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=da503bef_09210100.resp
to Specification 346, the Florida Test Method 5-578 or FM 5-578, is being replaced by AASHTO T 358, ? As a philosophical question, if the AASHTO method for testing concrete resistivity is preferred over, prepared a graph presenting data from round robin testing showing the relationship between 7-day, test methods in the table above. Response: Changes made, . There is variability in the test methods and in the correlation between C186 and C1702. Therefore, it cannot
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/comments-responses/9210100.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=723adcb0_09750602.resp
revision. No change made. 2. In the second sentence of 975-6.2: Apply the finish coating to each test, propose that this sentence be written out as: Apply the finish coating to each test panel at a rate, the finish coating to each test panel at a rate of 50, plus or minus, 10 square feet per gallon, made. 2. The Section should start with the phase 'For product testing prepare 4...' Response: Spelling out four, differentiates the dimensions following from the number of test panels expected. It
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2017/january-2017/review/comments-responses/9750602.resp.pdf?sfvrsn=448045f5_03530302.FHWA
by cylinder testing as specified in 353-5 or the use of the maturity method test as described, , by either a cylinder test report or a printed maturity meter monitoring record. Protect the pavement, . Verify the achievement of the required strength by cylinder testing as specified in 353-5 or the use of the maturity method test as described in 353-10.2. Submit documentation that 6-hour strength was achieved prior to opening to traffic, by either a cylinder test report or a printed maturity
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/july-2016/review/fhwa/3530302.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=bb2883f8_029thAsphaltConferenceMinutes
of the results? All fine-graded TL-D and TL-E mixes are rut tested. Most of the time, rut testing, Assurance Testing Labs Rinker Materials ROADTEC SemMaterials Company EXHIBITORS: Asphalt Zipper, Technologies Inc. CTI-Construction Testing & Inspections ROADTEC Heatec Inc. E.A. Mariani Asphalt Company Lengemann of Florida PRI Asphalt Technologies Quality Assurance Testing Labs Troxler, of tests taken after July 1 2005 more rapidly than was previously possible. On Course Development
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/construction/publications/meetingminutes/asphalt/asphaltconf/29thasphaltconferenceminutes.pdf?sfvrsn=3f4a09cc_0GL Complete 17-18
equipment used on the project? [120-10] 9. Ensure that all sampling and testing requirements are met and enforce the requirement that all samples and tests are taken randomly? Does the field test, frequency of one test per soil type [Spec. 125-9] 25. If Density tests fail, retest within a 5, is used when density test results are evaluated for materials acceptance? Are the appropriate materials, required density test results are documented on current forms provided by the department in accordance
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/construction/constadm/guidelist/inspectguidelist/fy1718/gl-complete-17-18.pdf?sfvrsn=4d361c99_09940700.origind
with Section 6 and test reports documenting the retroreflective sheeting meets the requirements, . Final acceptance will be based on tests and verification in accordance with this Specification, Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide Schedule
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul10/files/9940700.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=b323b0a7_01600301.FHWA
: 160-4.2.4 Frequency: Conduct QC sampling and testing at a minimum frequency listed in the table below. The Engineer will perform Verification sampling and tests at a minimum frequency listed in the table below. Test Name Quality Control Verification Verification for Shoulder-Only, Bike/Shared
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2014/july-2014/review/fhwa/1600301.fhwa.pdf?sfvrsn=dcf2ecc_04620400.origind
462-11.5.4 requires a wick induced bleed test (per Section 938-4) to be conducted on post tensioning grout in the field prior to grouting. Section 938-4 requires this test to be conducted in the laboratory, test requirement is redundant, time consuming, and is a holdover from earlier versions, to delete the field conducted wick induced bleed test. Information source: M a r i o P aredes, SMO, ultimate tensile strength of the prestressing steel, when tested in an unbonded state, without exceeding
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul09/files/4620400.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=1d88720c_07000100.origind
, testing will be restarted. The Engineer may select to pause and extend the 630 day test period, substituted: 700-4.21 Operational Testing: After the system testing is successfully completed; conduct one continuous 72 hour, full-operating test prior to conducting the 630 day acceptance test. The Engineer will approve the type of tests to be conducted. Include in the tests all control, monitoring, is deleted and the following substituted: 700-4.22 Acceptance Testing: Conduct a 630 day acceptance
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/internal/7000100.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=a11a9e30_0introduction
admixtures to form a material with specific engineering properties. Assay – Chemical tests performed, testing laboratory neither owned nor operated by FDOT. Deficiency - Non-compliance with documented authority such as test methods, specifications, directives, manuals, procedures, etc. Density Log, records of density test results and test locations of soils used in roadway construction. Department, for evaluating qualified sampling and testing personnel and testing equipment. Independent Assurance (IA
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/administration/resources/library/publications/materialsmanual/documents/introduction.pdf?sfvrsn=ebc62ef9_16v1-section81-clean.pdf
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International Standard Test Methods and Specifications American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Part I Specifications, and Part II Tests Topic No.: 675-000-000, , test, store, and ship Products meeting the requirements of the Specifications and other Contract, reviews the Plant’s s hop drawings, fabrication process, QC testing, inspection, and documentation
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/administration/resources/library/publications/materialsmanual/documents/v1-section81-clean-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=2c108131_89160000.comm
distinguish between PG64-22 and PG67-22. See remark about Binder substitution. For BBR testing, PG52-28 is tested at -18°C, not -12°C. Response: ******************************************************************************
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jan13/files/9160000-comm.pdf?sfvrsn=a870329b_46300201-724IMPL
630 CONDUIT. (REV 7-6-23) (FA 11-1-23) (FY 2024-25) SUBARTICLE 630-2.1 is deleted and the following substituted: 630-2 Materials. 630-2.1 Conduit: Use materials that have been tested and listed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory to the following industry standards: Schedule 40 and 80 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 1 ................... UL 651 Fiberglass Reinforced Epoxy 2 (below ground) ................... UL 2420 Fiberglass Reinforced Epoxy 2 (above ground
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2024-25/review/implemented/6300201-724impl.pdf?sfvrsn=98de6147_1D9670001.do
, test methods, inspection, and certification related to galvanizing regardless of the method, analysis of test results meeting the specification limits of the ASTM or AASHTO designation as stated above. Certification of these test values, representing each shipment of guardrail materials
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2003/files/d9670001.do9712950aefc3417596244ab539bad147.pdf?sfvrsn=7afc2a86_0D9670001.do
, test methods, inspection, and certification related to galvanizing regardless of the method, analysis of test results meeting the specification limits of the ASTM or AASHTO designation as stated above. Certification of these test values, representing each shipment of guardrail materials
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2003/files/d9670001.do.pdf?sfvrsn=24b4c0ca_0SS9600201
ultimate tensile strength (GUTS) when tested in an unbonded state, without exceeding anticipated anchor, Specifications and “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications.” (d) Test anchorage with typical, bolts shall be used to attach cap to anchorage. (f) Certified test reports documenting steel chemical
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/julworkbook2013/files/ss9600201.pdf?sfvrsn=96831add_0120LAP.comm
there is no QC process control requirements, and is accepted from engineer’s test. b. The only, being met, there is nothing in place for re-verification of the material tested in the lab, is solely responsible for verification of field density and laboratory proctor test results
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/implemented/workbooks/history/jul12/files/120lap.comm.pdf?sfvrsn=35f69bd3_09320103.impl
932 NONMETALLICACCESSORYMATERIALS FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES. (REV4-3-15)(FA4-14-15)(1-16) SUBARTICLE932-1.3.2isdeletedandthefollowingsubstituted: 932-1.3.2 P h y s i c a l R e quirements: Silicone Sealant Type Test Method TypeA TypeB TypeC TypeD Flow ASTMD5893 NoFlow, Silicone Sealant Type Test Method TypeA TypeB TypeC TypeD Humidity) Elongation (Cured 21 days, shall be tested in accordance with AASHTO T132
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2016/january-2016/review/implemented/9320103.impl.pdf?sfvrsn=7f36584_0DRB__ChoctawBayBridge
to push the test pile permit application non-formal (Section 7) based on the fact that the Department, assumed no link between the test pile permit process and the dredge and fill permit processes. The new requirement by the Department to perform noise monitoring during the test pile process, linked, in their position papers, by their testimony at the DRB Hearing, and the DRB’s analysis
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/construction/constadm/drb/decision/d3/2017/drb__choctawbaybridge.pdf?sfvrsn=25abc51a_0