4646 search results for pavement design
2025FDM225Transit
Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual 225 - Public Transit Facilities 225 Public Transit, be considered in the roadway design process when a project includes a public transit route. The Department’s Accessing Transit: Version III, 2013 Design Handbook for Florida Bus Passenger Facilities, ) is necessary in developing the plans. Additional guidance on the design of transit facilities is available in the 2014 AASHTO publication, A Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/2025fdm225transit.pdf?sfvrsn=37fc62a4_12026FDM223Bikes
. The use of green-colored pavement markings requires the approval of the District Design Engineer, Phase I of design. The addition of green-colored pavement markings to bicycle lanes per these criteria, with the BOE Manual. Load these quantities into the Designer Interface in the Signing and Pavement Marking, 22 Exhibit 223-1: Bicycle Lane Typical Pavement Marking Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual, or shared use paths designated through signage, pavement markings or mapping. They provide directional
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2026/review/2026fdm223bikes.pdf?sfvrsn=2e0ebd83_5E1X04Addendum001
account designated for submittals), who will confirm qualification for the prospective Design-Build Firm, ] 2012261__M.P. 8.5_M.P. 11.6 A15 - Pavement design 452356-1 Pavement Design Memo 452357-1 Pavement, account designated for submittals), who will confirm qualification for the prospective Design-Build Firm, _______________________________ Company Name Florida Department of Transportation District 1 LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD, website. January 3, 2025 0 Final deadline for submission of requests for Design Exceptions
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d1/designbuild/e1x04/e1x04addendum001.pdf?sfvrsn=85bb5769_1DesignBuildSpecificationsjan05
DesignBuildSpecificationsjan05, ,whenfollowedbyanumber or letter designation, or combination of numbers and letters, designates a specification, test, Manager. TheDepartment’s designee responsible for the administration of the Design-Build Contract, Page 1 of 119 DESIGN-BUILD SPECIFICATIONS. (REV 12-6-04) DIVISION I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, the meaning described: Adjusted Score-Design/Build. A Design/Build Contract on which the Contract, that performs services for the Design-Build Firm in connection with the design and construction
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2005/january-2005/design-build/designbuildspecificationsjan05.pdf?sfvrsn=9d0e17de_02026FDM223Bikes
are designated by a bicycle symbol pavement marking in accordance with Standard Plans, Index 711-002, . The use of green-colored pavement markings requires the approval of the District Design, Phase I of design. The addition of green-colored pavement markings to bicycle lanes per, with the BOE Manual. Load these quantities into the Designer Interface in the Signing and Pavement Marking, website: https://www.fdot.gov/gis/bim/green-pavement. Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual January 1
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2026/2026fdm223bikes.pdf?sfvrsn=3a8b8a8b_52025FDM223Bikes
are designated by a bicycle symbol pavement marking in accordance with Standard Plans, Index 711-002, . The approval must be obtained during Phase I of design. The addition of green-colored pavement, Design Manual 223 - Bicycle Facilities Figure 223.2.4 SBL Curb Types 223.2.5.1 Pavement Markings, Route System Bicycle routes include roadways or shared use paths designated through signage, pavement, are nominated for national designation by State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and are designated
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2025/2025fdm223bikes.pdf?sfvrsn=646ae7d9_2E1X04Addendum004
- Pavement design 452356-1 Pavement Design Memo 452357-1 Pavement Design Memo A16 - Design exceptions, to the appropriate district (to the Design-Build email account designated for submittals), who, LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For I-75 (SR 93) at Sumter Blvd. & I-75 (SR 93, (375-020-17) 2. Design Build Proposal of Proposer (375-020-12) 3. Design Build Bid Proposal Form, , 11B) Florida Department of Transportation District 1 LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d1/designbuild/e1x04/e1x04addendum004.pdf?sfvrsn=721c1cb0_1E1X04-Addendum No 5
17075-3403_SR 93_[I_75] 2012261__M.P. 8.5_M.P. 11.6 A15 - Pavement design 452356-1 Pavement Design Memo 452357-1 Pavement Design Memo A16 - Design exceptions and variations 452356-1 Design Variation, be submitted to the appropriate district (to the Design-Build email account designated for submittals, _______________________________ Company Name Florida Department of Transportation District 1 LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST, - Lighting Design Analysis Report (LDAR) 452356-1-I-75-Sumter LDAR-90% 452357-1-I-75- Toledo
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d1/designbuild/e1x04/e1x04-addendum-no-5.pdf?sfvrsn=8f2a7c11_1E1X04Addendum002
State Proj 17075-3403_SR 93_[I_75] 2012261__M.P. 8.5_M.P. 11.6 A15 - Pavement design 452356-1 Pavement Design Memo 452357-1 Pavement Design Memo A16 - Design exceptions and variations 452356-1 Design, to the appropriate district (to the Design-Build email account designated for submittals), who, No. 2 4 Attachments Added: A27 – Lighting Design Analysis Report (LDAR) 452356-1-I-75-Sumter, of Transportation District 1 LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For I-75 (SR 93) at Sumter Blvd
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d1/designbuild/e1x04/e1x04addendum002.pdf?sfvrsn=8b0091c4_1E1X04Addendum003
__M.P. 8.5_M.P. 11.6 A15 - Pavement design 452356-1 Pavement Design Memo 452357-1 Pavement Design, designated for submittals), who will confirm qualification for the prospective Design-Build Firm. The form, Department of Transportation District 1 LOW BID DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For I-75 (SR, DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For I-75 (SR 93) at Sumter Blvd. & I-75 (SR 93) at Toledo Blade, . .......................................................................................................................6 A. Design-Build Responsibility
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/contracts/d1/designbuild/e1x04/e1x04addendum003.pdf?sfvrsn=49e22945_120231013_443358-2_No SR_08000
locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization. 443358-2 CRACK All, 1.70 1.70 9.00 1.50 MIN 1.20 1.20 4.00 0.60 LAYER COEF. 0.25 UNKW 0.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION, cored at the time of the investigation. Should questions arise regarding the pavement composition, . PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) CITRUS SR No.: BASE NA 5. A blank cell indicates measurement was not recorded
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/02/20231013_443358-2_no-sr_08000.pdf?sfvrsn=786b2d70_120230927_447378-1_SR 64_13050
. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization. 447378-1 CRACK All Cores 2, : Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor CO - Crossover TL - Turn Lane ML - Mainline, Lane RL/RR - Left/Right Turn Lane Roadway ID: 13050000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type 6. A value of "UNK" indicates material was encountered, RIVER BRDG # 0137 Inside: Shoulder Type and Condition: Overall Pavement Condition (from DMO field
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/13/20230927_447378-1_sr-64_13050.pdf?sfvrsn=b4b11069_120240111_441098-3_SR 580_10310
was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness, Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION CORING AND CONDITION DATA County: F.A. Project No.: Fin. Proj. ID, arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) Hillsborough SR No.: Paved BASE 0.602
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/10/20240111_441098-3_sr-580_10310.pdf?sfvrsn=cee30f83_120220722_449852-1_SR 616_10140
. Stabilization thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12, 3.50 LAYER COEF. 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.16 0.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor, : 10140000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type 6. A value, Extent S - Severe M - Moderate L - Light Inside: Shoulder Type and Condition: Overall Pavement, of the investigation. Should questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/10/20220722_449852-1_sr-616_10140.pdf?sfvrsn=1084b533_220231020_449178-1_SR 17_16090
3. Stabilization thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume, LAYER COEF. 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.18 0.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION CORING AND CONDITION DATA, of the investigation. Should questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) POLK SR
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/16/20231020_449178-1_sr-17_16090.pdf?sfvrsn=19f6b557_120241113_448964-1_No SR_04900
0.000 3. Stabilization thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, 1.30 LAYER COEF. 0.25 0.18 0.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION CORING AND CONDITION DATA County: F.A., of the investigation. Should questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) DESOTO SR
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/04/20241113_448964-1_no-sr_04900.pdf?sfvrsn=81143f94_120250708_451236-1_SR 35_14050001
thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness, 1.001.201.000.900.906.009.500.90 LAYER COEF. 0.000.250.250.250.180.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION CORING AND CONDITION, questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) PASCOSR No.: Paved: BASE
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/14/20250708_451236-1_sr-35_14050001.pdf?sfvrsn=859fb750_120250814_454985-1_SR 674_10120
thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches, 1.503.802.405.909.70 MIN 0.501.500.502.509.70 LAYER COEF. 0.000.250.250.160.180.08 Notes: Pavement, - Left/Right Turn Lane Roadway ID:10120000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations, Type and Condition: Overall Pavement Condition (from DMO field review):Fair Typical Section:1, questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/10/20250814_454985-1_sr-674_10120.pdf?sfvrsn=d30853ac_120250716_440734-1_SR NA_10740001
0.000 3. Stabilization thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, 0.701.300.601.000.801.000.302.309.0012.003.20 LAYER COEF. 0.250.250.230.250.250.25UNKW0.180.08 Notes: Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION, of the investigation. Should questions arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) HILLSBOROUGH SR
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/10/20250716_440734-1_sr-na_10740001.pdf?sfvrsn=c2b0dbb1_120250801_441552-1_SR 35_01040101
thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness, : Pavement Condition G - Good F - Fair P - Poor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION CORING AND CONDITION DATA County: F.A. Project No.: Fin. Proj. ID: W.P.I., arise regarding the pavement composition, it is incumbent upon those raising the question to perform additional exploration as necessary. PAVEMENT LAYER (IN.) CHARLOTTESR No.: Paved BASE 0.179
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/01/20250801_441552-1_sr-35_01040101.pdf?sfvrsn=30687278_1