13206 search results for DESIGN
SMO-25-11
of the Current Design and Performance of Flooded State Roads in Florida Justification This research, Offices/ Districts Materials and Design Offices Existing Work 1. “Case Study on the Impact, that have experienced inundation. Based on this data, we can then begin to determine designs, to additional research that can provide focused recommendations for pavement designs and material
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/program_information/contract.development/ballot/smo-25-11.pdf?sfvrsn=3292cbbc_12024FDM202SpeedMgmt
be designed using a CADD-based vehicle turning path (e.g., AutoTurn) to verify the appropriate design, Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual 202 - Speed Management 202 Speed Management 202.1, with the context classification of the roadway. The FDM recognizes a range of design speeds for each context classification. For very low speed conditions (35 mph or less) the context classification design speed range indicates the upper end of desirable operating speeds. For instance, the design speed
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2024/2024fdm202speedmgmt.pdf?sfvrsn=11708183_1Pt1Ch11_073124_clean
and Design Concept Acceptance................... 11-41 Public Involvement Documentation, ................... 11-87 Figure 11-22 Sample Location and Design Concept Acceptance Announcement ... 11-88, prior to the final Design phase. FDOT has established a plan for coordinating public and agency, to engage with and involve the public when planning, designing, constructing, and maintaining, , they help inform the agency of community issues and needs that should be considered in designing
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/environment/pubs/pdeman/2024/pt1ch11_073124_clean.pdf?sfvrsn=ac96175f_1FLEAT SP (27) - NCHRP350 TL3 - Drawings
QPL No. S536-0215 FLEAT-SP Date: August, 2009 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS DESCRIPTION FLEAT Terminal Single Anchor DRAWING NAME FLT-SP-S-375-FL FLEAT-SP NOTES 1. The guardrail end anchorage system represented on this drawing is a proprietary design by Road Systems, Inc. and marketed under the trade name FLEAT-SP. Any infringement on the rights of the designer shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 2. This drawing is sufficient for plan details
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/rdw/ispe/end-treatment/fleat-sp-(27)---nchrp350-tl3---drawings.pdf?sfvrsn=8e9f87ba_1FDOT Software Archive Downloads
all risk . Design files created and edited with legacy software might not be compliant with current, ORD Migration Tools Migrating FDOT Projects from SS10 to OpenRoads Designer. FDOT ORD Migration Tools
https://www.fdot.gov/cadd/downloads/software-archive/fdotcaddsoftwarearchiveSPI-641-010
Index 641-010 Concrete Poles Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports, Modifications to LRFDLTS-1; Structures Manual (SM)Introduction, I.6 References; FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations See FDM 261 and Structures Manual (SM),Volume 3 for additional design criteria. The following computer-based design program is available for use on the Structures Design Office Website: • University of Florida Bridge Software Institute ATLAS Program v7
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-641-010316cbaf3-dfc5-4435-b739-8100cf0812c1.pdf?sfvrsn=a967baaa_1SPI-641-010e
Index 641-010 Concrete Poles Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports, Modifications to LRFDLTS-1; Structures Manual (SM)Introduction, I.6 References; FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations See FDM 261 and Structures Manual (SM),Volume 3 for additional design criteria. The following computer-based design program is available for use on the Structures Design Office Website: • University of Florida Bridge Software Institute ATLAS Program v7
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2025/spi/spi-641-010e.pdf?sfvrsn=4263690_1SPI-641-010
Index 641-010 Concrete Poles Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports, Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations See FDM 261 and Structures Manual (SM) ,Volume 3 for additional design criteria. The following computer-based design program is available for use on the Structures Design Office Website: • University of Florida Bridge Software Institute ATLAS Program v7 or higher. For Pole Types P-III through P-VIII, design poles within the following
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-641-010183f0799-28e9-4e03-a0c5-187e99859b21.pdf?sfvrsn=a1d3edee_1SPI-641-010
Index 641-010 Concrete Poles Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports, Design Manual (FDM) Design Assumptions and Limitations See FDM 261 and Structures Manual (SM) ,Volume 3 for additional design criteria. The following computer-based design program is available for use on the Structures Design Office Website: • University of Florida Bridge Software Institute ATLAS Program v7 or higher. For Pole Types P-III through P-VIII, design poles within the following
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/design/standardplans/2026/spi/spi-641-010.pdf?sfvrsn=6c5f4ca4_34250000.origind
, and junction boxes, use Class II or IV concrete, as designated in the plansPlans and Design, , Drainage Are changes needed to the PPM, Design Standards, SDG, CPAM or other manual? Not at this time, (please include changes in the redline)? Is a Design Bulletin, Construction Memo, or Estimates, , and junction boxes from reinforced concrete as shown in the Design Standards and the plansPlans, : Use gratings and frames fabricated from structural steel or cast iron as designated
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2015/january-2015/review/internal/4250000.origind.pdf?sfvrsn=1495c47f_0D9320000.do
with the requirements of Design Standards, Index No. 305. Any modifications or exceptions, for the specified design load. The pads shall be tested at the appropriate level and shall satisfy, for the specific requirements shown in the following table: Serial Designations for Basic, A14,B14,C12, E034, F17, K21, Z (OZONE) Note: The complete designation of test requirements consists of the basic designation plus the suffix designation. ASTM D1149: Durometer50 Durometer60
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/2003/january-2003/workbook/d9320000.do.pdf?sfvrsn=8feecfa6_02026FDM230SPavtMarkings
Topic #625-000-002 FDOT Design Manual January 1, 2026 230 - Signing and Pavement Marking 1, stream. The design and layout of signs and pavement markings should complement the basic highway design. FHWA’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MUTCD) contains detailed information of all, designation. Signs and pavement markings not included in the MUTCD or in the Standard Plans are to be detailed in the plans. Sign and pavement marking design must comply with the Standard Specifications
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/roadway/fdm/2026/review/2026fdm230spavtmarkings.pdf?sfvrsn=3ed218c2_20fdot-bed65-rpt
to the success of this research. v Executive Summary The 10 th Edition of the AASHTO Bridge Design, the resulting structural behavior. Skewed bridges require specialized design considerations due, the structure, increasing the potential for over-stress and fatigue. Therefore, it is crucial to design, -frame configurations, such as X-type, K-type, and plate diaphragms, are designed to enhance, or wind events. Design and construction of end cross-frames in skewed bridges is challenging due
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bed65-rpt.pdf?sfvrsn=1c4110e8_19621001int
Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans Rick Jenkins Yes Florida Design Manual, materials requirements are in the correct specification Which FDOT offices does the change impact? Design, , 50 HSLAS, HSLAS-F, SS Designation, Style 962-10.43 Steel Grates: Provide steel grating, A, B, K Composition, Tensile*, Fine Grain A1011 Any SS, HSLAS, HSLAS-F Designation, Style, and the following substituted: 962-11.3.2 Fasteners and Hardware Designated as High-Strength
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/internal/9621001int.pdf?sfvrsn=ca0a3643_19621001ind
Documents/Offices Contacted Yes/No Other Standard Plans Rick Jenkins Yes Florida Design Manual, materials requirements are in the correct specification Which FDOT offices does the change impact? Design, , 50 HSLAS, HSLAS-F, SS Designation, Style 962-10.43 Steel Grates: Provide steel grating, A, B, K Composition, Tensile*, Fine Grain A1011 Any SS, HSLAS, HSLAS-F Designation, Style, and the following substituted: 962-11.3.2 Fasteners and Hardware Designated as High-Strength
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/specifications/by-year/fy-2026-27/review/industry/9621001ind.pdf?sfvrsn=18730ef4_120231016_450879-1_SR 17_16090
. Stabilization thickness was checked on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches, Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type 6. A value of "UNK" indicates, on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization, /LR - Left/Right Turn Lane RL/RR - Left/Right Turn Lane Roadway ID: 16090000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type 6. A value of "UNK" indicates material
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/16/20231016_450879-1_sr-17_16090.pdf?sfvrsn=8dd3778b_120220504_447880-1_SR 865_12004
locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization. 447880-1 CRACK All Cores, - Left/Right Turn Lane Roadway ID: 12004000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/12/20220504_447880-1_sr-865_12004.pdf?sfvrsn=832b20b_120231030_451272-1_SR 45_03010
design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization. 4. The cross slope is approximate, A - Alligator Class IB - Hairline cracks that are ≤ 1/8 inch wide L - Light Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type Crack Type Crack Rating M - Moderate LL/LR - Left, on 10% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization, - Light Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type Crack Type
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/03/20231030_451272-1_sr-45_03010.pdf?sfvrsn=eed71ec4_120210629_441977-1_SR 78_05010
% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization, /Right Turn Lane Roadway ID: 05010000 Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d1/05/20210629_441977-1_sr-78_05010.pdf?sfvrsn=d209c171_120230217_446270-1_SR 582_10290
% of the coring locations. For pavement design, assume 12 inches of thickness for stabilization. 2, - Outside/Inside Shoulder LL/LR - Left/Right Turn Lane RL/RR - Left/Right Turn Lane Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type Crack Rating Extent S - Severe M, Shoulder LL/LR - Left/Right Turn Lane RL/RR - Left/Right Turn Lane Lane Designations - Decreasing MP Lane Designations - Increasing MP Lane Type 6. A value of "UNK" indicates material was encountered
https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/pavement/coringdata/d7/10/20230217_446270-1_sr-582_10290.pdf?sfvrsn=985aa918_1